Home | Features | IDEAS WORKING NOW | A New Day for Radio

A New Day for Radio

Font size: Decrease font Enlarge font

Back in the late 90’s I began work as a New Business Development director for a pair of start-up Smooth Jazz radio stations (it was a glorified title given to me by the owner of the stations that translated into a Production Director that worked with sales people on ideas to generate new direct business). At the time, I had devised a plan that was less than “sexy” but highly effective: spec spots. The goal was to add $250,000 in new business on top of the 1.2 million the station made the year prior by using the plan to target new advertisers. By years end – we had generated over $900,000 in new direct business.

When I would work with new sales people I’d recommend the book “Positioning” by Ries and Trout as a starting point, asking them to read it and provide their thoughts on the concepts described in the book. Of those that even bothered to take the time to read it – the feedback would be mixed. Either they came back and said “Wow! I get it! This book is fantastic!”, or they’d return with some half-hearted, shoulder-shrug comment along the lines of “Yeah, it was okay. It’s just common sense”.  Needless to say, those that had a ‘Wow!’ reaction ALWAYS out performed those that dismissed the book’s teachings as merely common sense.

The ‘common sense’ of the book revolves around a simple axiom that I’ve carried with me ever since – “don’t tell me how you’re better; tell me how you’re different”.

As we meet and talk with radio folks about the future of the industry, we dive into all sorts of possible scenarios about how the radio business model will be reshaped.  In the years we’ve been having these types of discussions we’ve run into far more of the shoulder-shruggers than we have the “Wow!” crowd… and you guessed it… the ‘Wow’s’ continue to out perform the ‘common sense’ folks.  The wow crowd is expanding their horizon beyond traditional spot and dot radio. They are experimenting, investing, learning and earning.

It appears clear that radio is faced with an either/or proposition going forward. Either they will merely accept the fact that they will be a smaller industry overall in terms of revenue, or they will need to revamp the business model to grow revenue in new and different ways.  Most we meet say they aren’t willing to accept the first option, yet at the same time we see no evidence that they are working on a concrete plan to embrace the second.

The Changing Model
Changing a longstanding business model is not as simple as saying “it needs to be done”. For example, one wrinkle is the fact that radio’s current model is influenced by a number outside industries – all of which are undergoing significant change themselves. The music industry, the advertising industry, the ratings industry, and the government itself are all struggling with change of their own.  Whatever decisions those industries make regarding their future, it will certainly help shape and develop the type of business model radio ultimately embraces.

However, it’s our opinion that radio cannot simply wait around for the others to define what they are going to do before putting some serious thought into what radio’s own future will become. Radio, at some point, will need to take the lead in the discussion of their destiny. That lead role will involve risk, trial and error, investment, and most of all…patience.

Ratings Don’t Matter
In the years I spent as a Program Director I cannot recall one single instance where a listener came up to me at an event or a remote and said: “the reason I listen to your station is because your station the number one station.”  In fact, even if your station is 13th in the market – I’d argue you’re number one in the minds of the people that listen to you regularly.

Put another way… people don’t love to use Google because it’s the number one search engine – Google is the number one search engine because people love to use it.

Seems to me the only ones that truly benefit from radio ratings are those that provide ratings, and those that use those ratings to beat radio over the head for a lower rate. So what’s the role of ratings in a new business model? Is it time for this measurement tool of the past to give up the ghost?

For those that believe radio cannot survive without ratings in their business model we invite you to consider how some stations beyond the top-five in your market, or stations in markets without ratings manage to operate successfully. They seem to be making money… albeit some more effectively than others.

One could argue that even though radio has generated a good deal of revenue from the ratings-based model, the model never truly made sense.  For example, if I’m looking to do a direct mail piece in a particular city the cost starts relatively low, and increases as I define the target in more detail. Yet, the opposite seems true in radio.

Let’s say I approach a direct mail company and they tell me they can deliver my ad to 300,000 households for 3 cents per household. The moment I tell them that I only want to reach a handful of zip codes, the cost per household increases. If I define a gender, the price goes up again. Add a specific age range and income level… the price continues to climb.

Now look at radio… a larger, wide-ranging, widely-defined CHR audience (The generic 300k households) cost more per spot than a smaller, more narrowly-defined Smooth Jazz audience. Why?

For those that would argue the radio/direct mail argument is an “apples-to-oranges” comparison, I’m afraid you may have missed the point. The reason we see articles about marketers shifting dollars away from traditional media in favor of new forms of media revolves around the marketer’s ability to target and track the consumer according to specific criteria.

It’s no longer enough to know how many people you have listening to your station. You must understand who they are, where they live, and what interests them beyond the format of your station. If radio is going to build a new future – defining your audience in more exacting terms, it seems to us, is the difference that will make radio better.

--Chuck Francis, VP New Media Strategies, Remerge. Remerge Media is a multi-media consulting firm, specializing in new media integration and simultaneous media solutions. Remerge works with radio (as well as other legacy media) clients to help them understand, integrate and generate revenue from new media through custom sales solutions, and providing traditional media sales personnel with highly specialized training. Remerge solutions provide a high rate ROI for traditional media clients, as well as their ad clients. The company is based in Columbus, Ohio. More info about Remerge can be found online at RemergeMedia.com

 

Have an opinion on this article? Post your comment below.

Bookmark and Share

Today's Broadcasting News

RBR - Radio News
TVBR - TV/Cable News




Subscribe to comments feed Comments (5 posted):

Maynard Meyer on 28 July, 2009 08:41:33
avatar
I loved your comments on the unimportance of ratings when it comes to the bottom line. Here at KLQP-FM we have been in business for 26 years serving 5 sparsely populated counties here in Western Minnesota with 25KW. No one has ever asked about our ratings...they do ask if we can bring some people through their door and apparently we have been doing that since we have a lot of loyal advertisers who have stayed with us over the years. We don't spend any time trying to determine our standing in the marketplace...we just get out there and sell! Incidentally, we DO have several other stations in the area, many of whom are a lot bigger than we are.
Thumbs Up Thumbs Down
0
Rick Charles on 28 July, 2009 09:16:47
avatar
A very timely, brilliant article. Chasing cost per thousand is a fool's errand performed daily by agency buyers to justify their worth to the advertisers who hire them. Nearly every radio station has a core audience and a secondary audience who listens periodically. This, in itself, is a powerful product with which to market.
Using spec, or demo, ads custom written and produced for each prospect, is an effective radio sales tool that is usually ignored by the radio sales rep who is normally more interested in his goals (an order) than the prospect is interested in theirs (copy that gets results).
The great radio sales trainers preach using specs, but rarely do sales managers require a daily, weekly quota of their useage. If they did, radio would solve many of it's sales problems. It isn't up to the sales rep to use specs..it's up to the sales manager to require them, or face job termination.

Here's an analogy to Chuck's thinking that you may find odd, but I feel it's applicable.
My wife and I are avid wild bird lovers.
We create habit on our property for bird nesting, and feed wild birds year-round.
We could buy big bags of cheap bird seed and attract (reach) hundreds of birds. The problem is, most of the birds would be sparrows, starlings and blackbirds, species that are unattractive and aggressive and tend to crowd out the desirable varieties.
Instead, we buy smaller quantities of select seed blends that attract the cardinals, grosbeaks, finches, orioles and small woodpeckers. These seed varieties cost more, but they attract (reach) the desired species (audience) and bring them to the feeders (results).

I believe our industry has been sidetracked for the better part of a decade, worrying about the internet and satellite radio and ignoring the basic selling approach for radio that advertisers still find very appealing.
Thumbs Up Thumbs Down
0
Frank McCoy on 28 July, 2009 11:16:04
avatar
Everyone agrees that being able to tell a compelling narrative about the unique qualities of your listenership is a door opener and can get orders. The challenge is to determine what that story is and to articulate it in terms that an advertiser can relate to.
One area that is often overlooked is the simple geographic demographics of your coverage area. Few stations have access to high end mapping software that can provide research foundations for that compelling story. I've often wondered why?
Inagine if you could know, by zip and even block, where your listeners live and the degree to which they are representative of the surrounding population. Where do others of similar demographic profile live? How many live within X radius or Y drive time from the advertiser's location(s)?
Even more qualitative data like "How old is your car?" and, "What is the age and value of your home?" can be answered from readily-available mapping data layers. The US Census has a ton of highly detailed info and research firms like Nielsen sell more (Claritas is an example). Once you own it, you can run as many analyses as you want.
What's missing is, first, the software and, second, someone at the station to run it. Neither problem is all that difficult to solve.
Thumbs Up Thumbs Down
0
Mike Ginsburg on 28 July, 2009 11:48:52
avatar
Smart, well written article!
Thumbs Up Thumbs Down
0
Bob Atkinson on 04 August, 2009 02:03:22
avatar
This brings to mind that a system (corporation) is offered for sale that has raised local radio revenues of $250,00 to $500,000 (or more) in over 1000 markets with documented proof of purchase to advertizers and continue year after year. Contact me @ 203-226 3110 or the NAB/RAB convention. In addition, this will add good will and listenership! as well.
Thumbs Up Thumbs Down
0

Post your comment comment

Please enter the code you see in the image:

  • email Email to a friend
  • print Print version
Log in


RBR-TVBR readers rejected PRA negotiations two weeks ago. 8/23 NAB explained the proposal and wants the industry’s opinion, so we’ve simplified the answers and we're putting it before you again:
Submit your own poll Email production@rbr.com
www.harkerresearch.com




Facebook

Twitter

Rate this article
5.00