Home | Features | VIEWPOINTS | On the future of Citadel…

On the future of Citadel…

Font size: Decrease font Enlarge font
image Matt Williams

How can we allow Citadel Broadcasting to be swallowed by the governments’ bailout projects?  A recent sector surging on Wall Street is broadcasting, but one company stands out for staying behind.  Right now the third largest radio broadcaster, Citadel Media, is valued at a mere $30 Million.  Investors fear the company will fall to its debtors in January because of a $150 Million cash requirement.  The irony is that two if its debtors are the largest recipients of the government bailout.  The three big lenders to Citadel (CTDB) are JP Morgan Chase, ING, and GE.  JP Morgan received $25 Billion from the government in TARP funds. They also took over Bear Sterns, and the government funded $30 Billion of Stearn’s assets.  That’s $55 Billion of taxpayer money to JP.  So JP is going to turn around to the third largest broadcasting agency and say they are in debt, and take over Citadel?  No. There's no way that will happen.  That would cause a huge outcry!  What happened to “forgive us as we forgive our debtors?” Or it could at least be, “forgive us as we allow forbearance to our debtors?”  These lenders managed to slip an additional 4.25-4.50% per year interest on their debt to Citadel during negotiations this year.  That’s $50 million a year added to the debt principle.  Isn’t there something wrong here?  How did that one slide? Does anyone else know this is happening?  That should be reversed.  In a struggling time they are tightening a noose on Citadel.  It gives us an idea of why they lent the money in the first place.  I will be contacting my senator shortly about this issue. It’s too great an injustice. The government HELPED these lenders, and they turn around and do this.

Did I mention that ING is Dutch?  They got $13 Billion from the Dutch government. So we are going to lose our American Broadcasting to the Dutch?  Not to mention the FCC limits foreign ownership to 20% of a U.S. broadcaster.

FCC guidelines already restrict JP from ownership in Citadel.  They own media in the same markets. We know what newspapers are involved and in what markets.  We will let the FCC deal with that issue.  General Electric already owns 80% of NBC, MSNBC, 26 television stations, etc.  Here’s a link to some of its media assets: http://www.ge.com/products_services/media_entertainment.html

The time will come when the truth about Citadel will come out. They have done everything to avoid restructuring. They have a positive cash flow. Investors should take an eye at that stock.  A political voice concerning the outcome of this company needs to be made before the governments' bailout projects decide. It's our tax dollars bailing out JP Morgan.  Not to mention all of the FCC regulations regarding ownership for these large companies in broadcasting.   Who cares that the stock of CTDB is worthless, look at what's happening here.  Citadel can stand on its own two feet.  It’s scary to think the third largest radio broadcaster would fall into these huge companies.  They will advertise and grow their businesses for free, we will be surrounded by their political opinions and agendas, and their empires will only grow larger if they absorb Citadel.

-- Matt Williams, personal investor / health care field

Have an opinion on this article? Post your comment below.

Bookmark and Share

Today's Broadcasting News

RBR - Radio News
TVBR - TV/Cable News




Subscribe to comments feed Comments (3 posted):

John Smith on 2009-11-05 08:20:56
avatar
Not to debunk your entire article but you are a little misguided as to potential ownership by JPM etc. These "loans" made to Citadel by the banks are no different than a stock or bond. Initially the money was loaned by those banks. The loans are are then sold on to others and traded everyday by mutual funds, pension funds, banks, hedge funds and other institutional investors. It is highly unlikely that the combination of banks you mentioned above would own more than 20% of Citadel's total debt. they will not control the company if they restructure. it would be no different than if JPM bought 20% of stock in Entercom. They would not all of sudden have free advertising or any control of the firm whatsoever. So, to assume these "bailed out" banks have the majority of the economic interest is just flat out wrong.
Thumbs Up Thumbs Down
0
Mark Heller on 2009-11-05 15:31:14
avatar
Your article is off the charts, and so far in left field. First, there are buyers for the beachfront property. There probably is a buyer for the 24/7 music formats, based in 'right to work' Texas for a reason. The news network may be another story. Which financial partners joined with Forstmann-Little many years ago to do this reverse Morris Trust exercise, is simply not relevant. The government is not going to bail out radio, and if they would, it would be women and minorities first, bean counters and leveraged buyout execs at the bottom of the list...that's what tax write-offs are all about. Citadel without Paul Harvey and Hannity, is just that...a bunch of beachfront properties, a middle-of-the-road music network and a newscast associated with a TV network, without much of the TV's reporters. And, invoking the Lord's Prayer (trespasses/debtors, etc) in a function of legalized gambling (the stock market) is simply irresponsible.
Thumbs Up Thumbs Down
0
Clem on 2009-11-09 18:41:37
avatar
So if you're an owner of the Citadel stock is it worth holding on to since it was more than cut in half today?
Thumbs Up Thumbs Down
0

Post your comment comment

Please enter the code you see in the image:

  • email Email to a friend
  • print Print version
Log in



Is your radio/TV station experiencing a recovery from the recession?
www.harkerresearch.com



Facebook

Twitter

Rate this article
0