Home | Features | VIEWPOINTS | Wanted: Coup de Grace Administrator for HD-AM

Wanted: Coup de Grace Administrator for HD-AM

Font size: Decrease font Enlarge font

HD-AM needs to be killed right now.  Form a single line, and no pushing and shoving, please. The late Bob Townsend, who resuscitated Avis Rent-A-Car with the famous “We Try Harder!” campaign and who wrote the best-selling corporate how-to “Up The Organization,” opined that every successful organization needs a Vice President In Charge Of Killing Bad Ideas.  Bob pointed out that such an exec could keep occasionally stupid concepts from burning up a lot of capital and careers.

If the radio industry were still possessed of its once-legendary common sense and cajones, our Veep Of Death’s 9:05am Monday task would be to march upstairs to HD-AM’s office and plant a 9mm round right in the center of the forehead without so much as an “excuse me” or a “good morning.”  That’s it: pop that cranial cap.  Bang.  Dead.  No soothing psychobabble.  Just the Dirt Nap In The EternaLounger for the indisputably worst iteration of a enormously bad idea, a/k/a the AM version of HD.

We could have HD-AM in the ground before lunch, giving everyone the afternoon off to celebrate, and Tuesday we could all be back at work concentrating on things that matter: like, for starters, quality programming which differentiates terrestrial radio from satellite, internet and new music choices.  (These would be actually productive pursuits, to be distinguished from obsessing on hopelessly flawed and self-destructive modulation schemes from an existing transmitter site.)

So why is HD-AM the most hated technical “innovation” in the history of a proud and close-knit industry?  Well…..let’s see.  It causes noise pollution on originating stations.  It’s fragile and craps out with the flip of every nearby light switch or lightning flicker.  It’s expensive.  The digital coverage sucks.  It’s a maintenance hog.  HD-AM capable radios are about as commonly available as Kruggerrands in a coin laundry.  The Chatty-Cathy Chorusing Codec makes every talk host sound like a vaguely gay Darth Vader.  It utterly fails to address AM’s real problems, namely: no night service for daytimers, extreme day-night pattern and power disparities, directional-pattern challenges, noise susceptibility and coverage deficits compared with FM.  And that’s for starters.

But worst of all is the Universal HD Lie neatly expressed in its nakedly dishonest generic moniker IBOC, or “In-Band-On-Channel,” a descriptor which still evokes wry laughter from knowing engineers.  Of course any broadcast pro who has looked at HD Radio’s system for 15 seconds knows that it’s “In-Band-On-Channel” in precisely the same sense Michael Moore can occupy a coach airline seat (“excuse me, sir – we can’t get the beverage cart past.  Please keep your jowls out of the aisle.”)  In the Stupid New World of HD, an 80-year old allocation scheme is trashed by the simple reality that stations which have been strictly limited to occupation of one channel (incurring, in many cases, FCC enforcement fines) are suddenly allowed to operate with impunity on three.  Sure, the IBOC cabal has contrived an onanistic rubric amounting to “see, the adjacent-channel interference isn’t so bad because…um….well, WHAT interference?” in the form of the cynically vaunted “NRSC mask.”  This is the junk-engineering skirt behind which IBOC perpetrators huddle; it was of course cobbled by iBiquity, a hapless NAB and HD developer-broadcasters to be force-fed to a cluelessly political FCC and employed solely as a foil to fend off the obviously inevitable future interference complaints. 

Several things about adjacent-channel HD-AM interference and “the (wink, nod, smirk) Mask.”  Supposedly adjacent-channel digital noise is to be suppressed –28 dBc.  But that’s for ONE digital carrier, and there are twenty-five in the passband of each adjacent channel.  The effects are additive at any analog radio’s detector, with the result that the obnoxious hiss is really only down 16 dB below carrier (consumer radios apparently didn’t get the Alliance’s memo about how quiet the adjacent channel is claimed to be.  Perhaps HD-pushers would propose to read the NRSC mask study to the 500 million functioning AM radios out there to “fix the problem.”)  The proof of the interference pudding is in the listening: spin your receiver dial across the AM band in any populated area of the nation at night and behold the ugly morass of roaring skywave hiss.  And: without speaking for other engineers reading this, the disparate noise figures claimed for HD don’t matter – to me at least, any piece of equipment generating steady-state noise either 16 or 28 dB below program is what I call “a malfunctioning piece of equipment.”  (Since one of HD’s claims is how key improved audio is to “fixing AM,” explain again to me precisely how it’s helpful to provide a worse signal-to-noise ratio than 1940s 78 rpm shellac records and telephone-bandpass audio quality for the analog listeners comprising 99.995% of AM’s existing listenership.)

In increasingly labored defenses of its engineering Donnybrook, HD’s dwindling band of defenders is reaping a bitter harvest from its manhandled, cynical and arrogant imposition on the radio industry (pressed by a well-known radio website’s owner about the potential for nighttime skywave interference from HD-AM at an NAB convention four years ago, a major-group engineer and IBOC proponent growled, “there isn’t going to be any interference, because we say so.”  A major-market CE declared to another radio industry periodical about the 2007 nighttime rollout of HD-AM:  “They say Armageddon is coming September 14th.  I’m the one who is going to start it.”)  Notwithstanding stubborn pronouncements from IBOC’s pushers and the FCC about an alleged dearth of adjacent-channel interference complaints, it’s well-known that there have been many:  WYSL vs. WBZ, WHP vs. WFIL (yes, a second-adjacent case), WNTP vs. WMVP, and KFMB vs. KBRT are just a few examples. 
 
The irony of the current situation is that HD was promoted as a potential savior of AM.  In practice HD-AM has been an unmitigated disaster, an unfunny joke and scourge for the radio industry.  To no good purpose whatsoever, HD has divided AM broadcasters into bitterly-opposed camps of interferors and victim stations deprived of any meaningful recourse by connivance of HD developers with the FCC.  HD-AM has totally failed to deliver on its engineering claims to resuscitate the band; if anything, it has made the interference and noise plaguing AM far worse with thundering nighttime adjacent-channel skywave hiss wiping out meaningful local coverage, in some cases obliterating even 50kw native signals.

If Sir Winston Churchill had lived to witness HD Radio on AM, he might have declared: “Never have so few done so much harm to so many – and to themselves – with so little justification.” 

Let a Radio Star Chamber of Common Sense issue its sentence and send the Veep of Death for HD-AM to do what we all know needs to be done – before “hybrid digital” further corkscrews AM into deepening oblivion.  The execution needs to happen right away.  We’ll never win back listeners with all this noise and crud convincing the public daily that AM radio is just an antiquated audio junkyard.

NEXT TIME:  The Real-World Nightmare of Nighttime IBOC: A Broadcaster’s Experience

--Bob Savage, President/GM, WYSL-AM Avon/Rochester, NY
[ See his various FCC pleadings by clicking on the pdfs on the right side of this page. ]

Have an opinion on this article? Post your comment below.

Bookmark and Share

Today's Broadcasting News

RBR - Radio News
TVBR - TV/Cable News




Subscribe to comments feed Comments (11 posted):

Robert E. Richer on 08 June, 2010 08:18:19
avatar
BRAVO, BRAVO, BRAVO!
Thumbs Up Thumbs Down
7
Pocket Radio on 08 June, 2010 12:13:40
avatar
The divide-and-conquer tactic may have been part of Struble's plans from the beginning - pitting broadcasters against one another gives Struble more control. He has caused nothing but chaos, and I hope he reaps the rewards of what will surely come back at him.
Thumbs Up Thumbs Down
7
Andrew Skotdal on 08 June, 2010 08:18:56
avatar
Respectfully, I disagree with Mr. Savage. HD-AM has had no negative impact on our signal, on our neighbor's signals, nor required maintenance of any kind. We had the benefit of designing our antenna system for HD and we have the latest software. We are also on the west coast where spacing is less of an issue than for AMs on the east coast. I don't believe it's realistic or wise to force AMs to convert, but for those who want to convert, it should be an option available to them. Our system sounds terrific, and it's working for us.
Thumbs Up Thumbs Down
-7
Bob Young on 09 June, 2010 01:52:07
avatar
Let's face the facts, HD has been an abject failure, time to put it out of it's misery.
Thumbs Up Thumbs Down
4
Dave Barnett on 09 June, 2010 11:17:17
avatar
The comments from Andrew (above) highlight exactly what is wrong with the HD implementation. It was done as a one-size-fits-all process. The reality is that adjacent-channel interference is different everywhere. There are many other differences. For example, on FM the higher ERP stations have way better digital coverage than the ones with low ERP and high elevation for the same class of license. You can't arbitrarily take analog coverage and say "digital needs to be X db down". There are many more examples besides the two listed here, and we're starting to see the real-world effects of these mistakes.
Thumbs Up Thumbs Down
-1
Pocket Radio on 09 June, 2010 07:50:27
avatar
"Another Editorial Rant about HD Radio"

"AM HD Radio critics have hailed how the AM HD carriers do not fit within the NRSC-2 passband and permissible FCC emission mask. If true, this would be illegal. However, iBiquity was careful to design these carriers to fit within the NRSC-2 mask. They took advantage of a 'legal loophole,' in that the NRSC-2 mask was never designed for continuous energy to be contained within the two outer (lower and upper) sidebands of any given AM radio station... This hissing sound steps onto the station's first and second adjacent neighbors."

http://meduci.com/

"Statement of Jeff Littlejohn SVP Engineering Services Clear Channel"

"The current AM allocation rules require Co-Channel stations to provide 20:1 protections to each other and first adjacent channel stations to provide 2:1 protection to each other. While this works fine in an all-analog environment, it does not seem to be sufficient in the presence of IBOC. The energy above 10 KHz from the proposed Hybrid IBOC signal significantly exceeds the energy present in the current analog AM signal. For this reason, the amount of energy provided to a first adjacent station is significantly more detrimental than our current allocation rules allow for."

http://www.am-dx.com/clearchannelrprt.pdf
Thumbs Up Thumbs Down
2
Simon B. on 14 June, 2010 08:02:34
avatar
Hey Andrew Skotdal - take a little trip out of your own back yard. You may be enjoying the AM digital party but in virtually all the entire known world it's causing major interference issues. I'm sure it's happening in your area as well but you chose to ignore it. I suggest you do a little more homework on this and then get back with me and we'll go over it again.
Thumbs Up Thumbs Down
1
spiller on 23 June, 2010 11:16:14
avatar
[url=http://ucoztime.ucoz.ru/]Шаблоны для ucoz[/url]
Thumbs Up Thumbs Down
0
spiller1 on 23 June, 2010 11:17:19
avatar
asdsadasd
Thumbs Up Thumbs Down
0
Шаблоны для ucoz on 23 June, 2010 11:55:32
avatar
Thank u! Very interesting!
Thumbs Up Thumbs Down
0
Ethan Tudor W. on 11 August, 2010 12:54:14
avatar
I just want to say, the JUMP BACK to AM is not really a "Jump Back", it's a RETRO thing, by a RETRO guy that thinks there is GREAT content out there to support an AM Station again! Since I have had my show "The NeverHood", I have had, Mark Lester, Davy Jones, Adam Savage, Alison Arngrim, Patrick Labroteax, Paul & Storm, Wil Wheaton, James Best, Meeno Peluce, and OTHERS on for a GREAT talk show! I'm willing to head this if anyone E-Mails me at ethantudorw@gmail.com, or CALLS me at 310-406-5835....I want an AM Station for all of us Geeks/Nerds that enjoy, RPG, Blogging, Tweeting, and just using our IMAGINATION. Lets make it ours...Contact me...-Ethan Tudor W. www.blogtalkradio.com/ethantudorw
Thumbs Up Thumbs Down
0

Post your comment comment

Please enter the code you see in the image:

  • email Email to a friend
  • print Print version
Log in


RBR-TVBR readers rejected PRA negotiations two weeks ago. 8/23 NAB explained the proposal and wants the industry’s opinion, so we’ve simplified the answers and we're putting it before you again:
Submit your own poll Email production@rbr.com
www.harkerresearch.com




Facebook

Twitter

Rate this article
0