<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:base="http://www.rbr.com/">
	<title type="text"></title>
	<id>http://www.rbr.com/</id>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" hreflang="en" href="index.php" />
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.rbr.com/features/viewpoints/index.1.atom" />
	<rights>&amp;copy;2007 Spoonlabs d.o.o.</rights>
	<generator>Vivvo CMS 4.0</generator>
	<updated>2008-12-01T12:57:49-06:00</updated>
	
			
				
					<entry>
						<title>On Nielsen Radio…</title>
						<id>http://www.rbr.com/features/viewpoints/11343.html</id>
						<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" hreflang="en" href="http://www.rbr.com/features/viewpoints/11343.html" />
						<published>2008-11-18T09:21:00-06:00</published>
						<updated>2008-11-18T09:21:00-06:00</updated>
						<author>
							<name>Carl Marcucci</name>
						</author>
						<category term="tech" scheme="http://www.rbr.com/features/viewpoints/11343.html" label="tech" />
						<content type="html">I've been getting calls and e-mails about my thoughts on the Nielsen/Cumulus sticker diary service, just announced yesterday. Here is my initial assessment of the </content>
					</entry>
				
					<entry>
						<title>Citadel is not worthless</title>
						<id>http://www.rbr.com/features/viewpoints/11309.html</id>
						<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" hreflang="en" href="http://www.rbr.com/features/viewpoints/11309.html" />
						<published>2008-11-16T03:00:00-06:00</published>
						<updated>2008-11-16T03:00:00-06:00</updated>
						<author>
							<name>Jack Messmer</name>
						</author>
						<category term="tech" scheme="http://www.rbr.com/features/viewpoints/11309.html" label="tech" />
						<content type="html">Regarding Morningstar columnist Matthew Coffina’s pronouncement that Citadel Broadcasting’s stock is worthless, my inclination is to say B.S., and I don’t mean Barbra Streisand!  Maybe the stock isn’t cranking out dividends, but</content>
					</entry>
				
					<entry>
						<title>What a loser can teach a winner</title>
						<id>http://www.rbr.com/features/viewpoints/11182.html</id>
						<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" hreflang="en" href="http://www.rbr.com/features/viewpoints/11182.html" />
						<published>2008-11-10T08:50:00-06:00</published>
						<updated>2008-11-10T08:50:00-06:00</updated>
						<author>
							<name>Carl Marcucci</name>
						</author>
						<category term="tech" scheme="http://www.rbr.com/features/viewpoints/11182.html" label="tech" />
						<content type="html">As a Strategist, I am guilty of seeing most things through a Brand-Marketing filter. As such, the McCampaign was painful to watch. </content>
					</entry>
				
					<entry>
						<title>The unfairness of a doctrine</title>
						<id>http://www.rbr.com/features/viewpoints/11181.html</id>
						<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" hreflang="en" href="http://www.rbr.com/features/viewpoints/11181.html" />
						<published>2008-11-09T19:47:00-06:00</published>
						<updated>2008-11-09T19:47:00-06:00</updated>
						<author>
							<name>Dave Seyler</name>
						</author>
						<category term="tech" scheme="http://www.rbr.com/features/viewpoints/11181.html" label="tech" />
						<content type="html">A reader points out why nobody should want the Fairness Doctrine to come back to life. If we really need a Fairness Doctrine, shouldn&amp;#039;t we have one that&amp;#039;s really fair? Was ABC-TV&amp;#039;s Boston</content>
					</entry>
				
					<entry>
						<title>What will radio look like.....AFTER THE CUTS?</title>
						<id>http://www.rbr.com/features/viewpoints/11152.html</id>
						<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" hreflang="en" href="http://www.rbr.com/features/viewpoints/11152.html" />
						<published>2008-11-09T15:08:00-06:00</published>
						<updated>2008-11-09T15:08:00-06:00</updated>
						<author>
							<name>Carl Marcucci</name>
						</author>
						<category term="tech" scheme="http://www.rbr.com/features/viewpoints/11152.html" label="tech" />
						<content type="html">Never before has there been so much opportunity for radio than there is today. We have so much going for us, but in order for radio to succeed in the</content>
					</entry>
				
					<entry>
						<title>On the “Radio Communications Group”</title>
						<id>http://www.rbr.com/features/viewpoints/10641.html</id>
						<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" hreflang="en" href="http://www.rbr.com/features/viewpoints/10641.html" />
						<published>2008-10-15T03:09:00-05:00</published>
						<updated>2008-10-15T03:09:00-05:00</updated>
						<author>
							<name>Carl Marcucci</name>
						</author>
						<category term="tech" scheme="http://www.rbr.com/features/viewpoints/10641.html" label="tech" />
						<content type="html">While the RAB is good at coming up with clever surveys and user profiles for consumers, the thing our industry has been sorely lacking is an &amp;quot;in your face&amp;quot; lobbying effort to lure</content>
					</entry>
				
					<entry>
						<title>Yes, the FCC should be involved</title>
						<id>http://www.rbr.com/features/viewpoints/10529.html</id>
						<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" hreflang="en" href="http://www.rbr.com/features/viewpoints/10529.html" />
						<published>2008-10-08T13:02:00-05:00</published>
						<updated>2008-10-08T13:02:00-05:00</updated>
						<author>
							<name>Jack Messmer</name>
						</author>
						<category term="tech" scheme="http://www.rbr.com/features/viewpoints/10529.html" label="tech" />
						<content type="html">I can&amp;#039;t justify the concept that the FCC has absolutely no control over Arbitron&amp;#039;s PPM, and should have a &amp;quot;hands-off&amp;quot; approach to the sudden and mysterious drop of Urban, Spanish and other formats not considered &amp;quot;Hockey Mom Friendly.&amp;quot;</content>
					</entry>
				
					<entry>
						<title>Sell honesty</title>
						<id>http://www.rbr.com/features/viewpoints/10479.html</id>
						<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" hreflang="en" href="http://www.rbr.com/features/viewpoints/10479.html" />
						<published>2008-10-07T00:03:00-05:00</published>
						<updated>2008-10-07T00:03:00-05:00</updated>
						<author>
							<name>Jack Messmer</name>
						</author>
						<category term="tech" scheme="http://www.rbr.com/features/viewpoints/10479.html" label="tech" />
						<content type="html">First things first: I am no big fan of Arbitron. At least not the diary system that exists in the majority of the country&amp;#039;s rated markets. I discontinued a contract with the ratings giant after spending</content>
					</entry>
				
					<entry>
						<title>Give Arbitron a hug</title>
						<id>http://www.rbr.com/features/viewpoints/10453.html</id>
						<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" hreflang="en" href="http://www.rbr.com/features/viewpoints/10453.html" />
						<published>2008-10-06T11:52:00-05:00</published>
						<updated>2008-10-06T11:52:00-05:00</updated>
						<author>
							<name>Jack Messmer</name>
						</author>
						<category term="tech" scheme="http://www.rbr.com/features/viewpoints/10453.html" label="tech" />
						<content type="html">I almost fell out of my chair this afternoon when I read a bulletin about nine radio broadcasters actually stepping up to the aide of Arbitron. Telling the FCC to &amp;quot;nose out&amp;quot; was an astounding move</content>
					</entry>
				
					<entry>
						<title>On Markey&#039;s Satellite/HD/AM/FM receiver bill…</title>
						<id>http://www.rbr.com/features/viewpoints/10423.html</id>
						<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" hreflang="en" href="http://www.rbr.com/features/viewpoints/10423.html" />
						<published>2008-10-06T04:12:00-05:00</published>
						<updated>2008-10-06T04:12:00-05:00</updated>
						<author>
							<name>Carl Marcucci</name>
						</author>
						<category term="tech" scheme="http://www.rbr.com/features/viewpoints/10423.html" label="tech" />
						<content type="html">Reading all of the hoopla about Rep. Ed Markey&amp;rsquo;s proposed radio Receiver Act I was hopeful for what would be a level playing field among </content>
					</entry>
				
					<entry>
						<title>Have You Hugged Your Radio Broker Lately?</title>
						<id>http://www.rbr.com/features/viewpoints/bob_heymann_media_services_group.html</id>
						<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" hreflang="en" href="http://www.rbr.com/features/viewpoints/bob_heymann_media_services_group.html" />
						<published>2008-10-02T05:07:00-05:00</published>
						<updated>2008-10-02T05:07:00-05:00</updated>
						<author>
							<name>Carl Marcucci</name>
						</author>
						<category term="tech" scheme="http://www.rbr.com/features/viewpoints/bob_heymann_media_services_group.html" label="tech" />
						<content type="html">I am not sure who needs the hug more.  Is it the station owner who is living through some very difficult operating times coupled with declining station cash flow</content>
					</entry>
				
					<entry>
						<title>New battles in the new frontier require new strategies</title>
						<id>http://www.rbr.com/features/viewpoints/10325.html</id>
						<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" hreflang="en" href="http://www.rbr.com/features/viewpoints/10325.html" />
						<published>2008-10-01T09:13:00-05:00</published>
						<updated>2008-10-01T09:13:00-05:00</updated>
						<author>
							<name>Jim Carnegie</name>
						</author>
						<category term="tech" scheme="http://www.rbr.com/features/viewpoints/10325.html" label="tech" />
						<content type="html">If you missed the webinar, What&amp;rsquo;s a website worth? Valuation Metrics for Local Websites, conducted today by the team at Borrell and Associates along with </content>
					</entry>
				
					<entry>
						<title>When if comes to localism, consider Furst things first</title>
						<id>http://www.rbr.com/features/viewpoints/when_if_comes_to_localism_consider_furst_things_first.html</id>
						<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" hreflang="en" href="http://www.rbr.com/features/viewpoints/when_if_comes_to_localism_consider_furst_things_first.html" />
						<published>2008-09-23T05:48:00-05:00</published>
						<updated>2008-09-23T05:48:00-05:00</updated>
						<author>
							<name>Dave Seyler</name>
						</author>
						<category term="tech" scheme="http://www.rbr.com/features/viewpoints/when_if_comes_to_localism_consider_furst_things_first.html" label="tech" />
						<content type="html">Programming consultant and blogger Alan Furst got to thinking about the FCC’s proposals to promote localism in radio and television</content>
					</entry>
				
					<entry>
						<title>The Emperor’s New Clothes</title>
						<id>http://www.rbr.com/features/viewpoints/10129.html</id>
						<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" hreflang="en" href="http://www.rbr.com/features/viewpoints/10129.html" />
						<published>2008-09-22T00:36:00-05:00</published>
						<updated>2008-09-22T00:36:00-05:00</updated>
						<author>
							<name>Carl Marcucci</name>
						</author>
						<category term="tech" scheme="http://www.rbr.com/features/viewpoints/10129.html" label="tech" />
						<content type="html">Once Upon a time there lived an Emperor (radio stockholders) who was so worried about his clothes (stock value) he didn’t know what to do</content>
					</entry>
				
					<entry>
						<title>Google&#039;s plan for radio</title>
						<id>http://www.rbr.com/features/viewpoints/10113.html</id>
						<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" hreflang="en" href="http://www.rbr.com/features/viewpoints/10113.html" />
						<published>2008-09-21T23:59:00-05:00</published>
						<updated>2008-09-21T23:59:00-05:00</updated>
						<author>
							<name>Carl Marcucci</name>
						</author>
						<category term="tech" scheme="http://www.rbr.com/features/viewpoints/10113.html" label="tech" />
						<content type="html">Almost as quietly as it began, Google celebrated its 10th birthday this past September. Hard to believe the search giant has become an advertising business heavyweight in just</content>
					</entry>
				
					<entry>
						<title>Russo on “The Fall of Citadel”</title>
						<id>http://www.rbr.com/features/viewpoints/rich_russo_russo_on_the_fall_of_citadel.html</id>
						<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" hreflang="en" href="http://www.rbr.com/features/viewpoints/rich_russo_russo_on_the_fall_of_citadel.html" />
						<published>2008-09-19T05:29:00-05:00</published>
						<updated>2008-09-19T05:29:00-05:00</updated>
						<author>
							<name>Carl Marcucci</name>
						</author>
						<category term="tech" scheme="http://www.rbr.com/features/viewpoints/rich_russo_russo_on_the_fall_of_citadel.html" label="tech" />
						<content type="html">JL Media’s Rich Russo had a few thoughts on a recent anonymous article about Citadel from a former ABC Radio Networks employee. &amp;quot;I read with horror and a dropped jaw the article</content>
					</entry>
				
					<entry>
						<title>The fall of Citadel</title>
						<id>http://www.rbr.com/features/viewpoints/the_fall_of_citadel.html</id>
						<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" hreflang="en" href="http://www.rbr.com/features/viewpoints/the_fall_of_citadel.html" />
						<published>2008-09-16T18:21:00-05:00</published>
						<updated>2008-09-16T18:21:00-05:00</updated>
						<author>
							<name>RBR/TVBR</name>
						</author>
						<category term="tech" scheme="http://www.rbr.com/features/viewpoints/the_fall_of_citadel.html" label="tech" />
						<content type="html">RBR recently received this scathing review from a former ABC Radio employee, who is still working in the industry and must remain anonymous. You will no doubt find it an interesting read</content>
					</entry>
				
					<entry>
						<title>The Network Exception and Political Rates</title>
						<id>http://www.rbr.com/features/viewpoints/skall_network_exception_and_political_rates.html</id>
						<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" hreflang="en" href="http://www.rbr.com/features/viewpoints/skall_network_exception_and_political_rates.html" />
						<published>2008-09-14T19:03:00-05:00</published>
						<updated>2008-09-14T19:03:00-05:00</updated>
						<author>
							<name>Carl Marcucci</name>
						</author>
						<category term="tech" scheme="http://www.rbr.com/features/viewpoints/skall_network_exception_and_political_rates.html" label="tech" />
						<content type="html">We’re into the home stretch of the 2008 political season and the presidential election is upon us.   Radio is receiving more attention than</content>
					</entry>
				
					<entry>
						<title>Political Advertisements: A Quick Review of Broadcasters’ Obligations</title>
						<id>http://www.rbr.com/features/viewpoints/9839.html</id>
						<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" hreflang="en" href="http://www.rbr.com/features/viewpoints/9839.html" />
						<published>2008-09-09T05:31:00-05:00</published>
						<updated>2008-09-09T05:31:00-05:00</updated>
						<author>
							<name>Carl Marcucci</name>
						</author>
						<category term="tech" scheme="http://www.rbr.com/features/viewpoints/9839.html" label="tech" />
						<content type="html">Are issue ads entitle to lowest unit rate? Is the broadcaster exempt from liability for false statements? Must the broadcaster</content>
					</entry>
				
					<entry>
						<title>The Old Days</title>
						<id>http://www.rbr.com/features/viewpoints/9793.html</id>
						<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" hreflang="en" href="http://www.rbr.com/features/viewpoints/9793.html" />
						<published>2008-09-07T19:16:00-05:00</published>
						<updated>2008-09-07T19:16:00-05:00</updated>
						<author>
							<name>Carl Marcucci</name>
						</author>
						<category term="tech" scheme="http://www.rbr.com/features/viewpoints/9793.html" label="tech" />
						<content type="html">First, I am not one who always is looking back on the “good ole’ days” but I am one who has gone from playing scratchy 45’s* to music on hard drive.  Spots on carts that would jam</content>
					</entry>
				
			
		
</feed>