<rss version="2.0" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/">
<channel>
	<generator>Vivvo CMS 4.0</generator>
	<title></title>
	<link>http://www.rbr.com/</link>
	<copyright>&amp;copy;2007 Spoonlabs d.o.o.</copyright>
	
	
			
				
					<item>
						<title>On Nielsen Radio…</title>
						<link>http://www.rbr.com/features/viewpoints/11343.html</link>
						<category>VIEWPOINTS</category>
						<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 03:21:00 -0600</pubDate>
						<description>I've been getting calls and e-mails about my thoughts on the Nielsen/Cumulus sticker diary service, just announced yesterday. Here is my initial assessment of the </description>
					</item>
				
					<item>
						<title>Citadel is not worthless</title>
						<link>http://www.rbr.com/features/viewpoints/11309.html</link>
						<category>VIEWPOINTS</category>
						<pubDate>Sat, 15 Nov 2008 21:00:00 -0600</pubDate>
						<description>Regarding Morningstar columnist Matthew Coffina’s pronouncement that Citadel Broadcasting’s stock is worthless, my inclination is to say B.S., and I don’t mean Barbra Streisand!  Maybe the stock isn’t cranking out dividends, but</description>
					</item>
				
					<item>
						<title>What a loser can teach a winner</title>
						<link>http://www.rbr.com/features/viewpoints/11182.html</link>
						<category>VIEWPOINTS</category>
						<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 02:50:00 -0600</pubDate>
						<description>As a Strategist, I am guilty of seeing most things through a Brand-Marketing filter. As such, the McCampaign was painful to watch. </description>
					</item>
				
					<item>
						<title>The unfairness of a doctrine</title>
						<link>http://www.rbr.com/features/viewpoints/11181.html</link>
						<category>VIEWPOINTS</category>
						<pubDate>Sun, 09 Nov 2008 13:47:00 -0600</pubDate>
						<description>A reader points out why nobody should want the Fairness Doctrine to come back to life. If we really need a Fairness Doctrine, shouldn&amp;#039;t we have one that&amp;#039;s really fair? Was ABC-TV&amp;#039;s Boston</description>
					</item>
				
					<item>
						<title>What will radio look like.....AFTER THE CUTS?</title>
						<link>http://www.rbr.com/features/viewpoints/11152.html</link>
						<category>VIEWPOINTS</category>
						<pubDate>Sun, 09 Nov 2008 09:08:00 -0600</pubDate>
						<description>Never before has there been so much opportunity for radio than there is today. We have so much going for us, but in order for radio to succeed in the</description>
					</item>
				
					<item>
						<title>On the “Radio Communications Group”</title>
						<link>http://www.rbr.com/features/viewpoints/10641.html</link>
						<category>VIEWPOINTS</category>
						<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 21:09:00 -0500</pubDate>
						<description>While the RAB is good at coming up with clever surveys and user profiles for consumers, the thing our industry has been sorely lacking is an &amp;quot;in your face&amp;quot; lobbying effort to lure</description>
					</item>
				
					<item>
						<title>Yes, the FCC should be involved</title>
						<link>http://www.rbr.com/features/viewpoints/10529.html</link>
						<category>VIEWPOINTS</category>
						<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 07:02:00 -0500</pubDate>
						<description>I can&amp;#039;t justify the concept that the FCC has absolutely no control over Arbitron&amp;#039;s PPM, and should have a &amp;quot;hands-off&amp;quot; approach to the sudden and mysterious drop of Urban, Spanish and other formats not considered &amp;quot;Hockey Mom Friendly.&amp;quot;</description>
					</item>
				
					<item>
						<title>Sell honesty</title>
						<link>http://www.rbr.com/features/viewpoints/10479.html</link>
						<category>VIEWPOINTS</category>
						<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 18:03:00 -0500</pubDate>
						<description>First things first: I am no big fan of Arbitron. At least not the diary system that exists in the majority of the country&amp;#039;s rated markets. I discontinued a contract with the ratings giant after spending</description>
					</item>
				
					<item>
						<title>Give Arbitron a hug</title>
						<link>http://www.rbr.com/features/viewpoints/10453.html</link>
						<category>VIEWPOINTS</category>
						<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 05:52:00 -0500</pubDate>
						<description>I almost fell out of my chair this afternoon when I read a bulletin about nine radio broadcasters actually stepping up to the aide of Arbitron. Telling the FCC to &amp;quot;nose out&amp;quot; was an astounding move</description>
					</item>
				
					<item>
						<title>On Markey&#039;s Satellite/HD/AM/FM receiver bill…</title>
						<link>http://www.rbr.com/features/viewpoints/10423.html</link>
						<category>VIEWPOINTS</category>
						<pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2008 22:12:00 -0500</pubDate>
						<description>Reading all of the hoopla about Rep. Ed Markey&amp;rsquo;s proposed radio Receiver Act I was hopeful for what would be a level playing field among </description>
					</item>
				
					<item>
						<title>Have You Hugged Your Radio Broker Lately?</title>
						<link>http://www.rbr.com/features/viewpoints/bob_heymann_media_services_group.html</link>
						<category>VIEWPOINTS</category>
						<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 23:07:00 -0500</pubDate>
						<description>I am not sure who needs the hug more.  Is it the station owner who is living through some very difficult operating times coupled with declining station cash flow</description>
					</item>
				
					<item>
						<title>New battles in the new frontier require new strategies</title>
						<link>http://www.rbr.com/features/viewpoints/10325.html</link>
						<category>VIEWPOINTS</category>
						<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 03:13:00 -0500</pubDate>
						<description>If you missed the webinar, What&amp;rsquo;s a website worth? Valuation Metrics for Local Websites, conducted today by the team at Borrell and Associates along with </description>
					</item>
				
					<item>
						<title>When if comes to localism, consider Furst things first</title>
						<link>http://www.rbr.com/features/viewpoints/when_if_comes_to_localism_consider_furst_things_first.html</link>
						<category>VIEWPOINTS</category>
						<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 23:48:00 -0500</pubDate>
						<description>Programming consultant and blogger Alan Furst got to thinking about the FCC’s proposals to promote localism in radio and television</description>
					</item>
				
					<item>
						<title>The Emperor’s New Clothes</title>
						<link>http://www.rbr.com/features/viewpoints/10129.html</link>
						<category>VIEWPOINTS</category>
						<pubDate>Sun, 21 Sep 2008 18:36:00 -0500</pubDate>
						<description>Once Upon a time there lived an Emperor (radio stockholders) who was so worried about his clothes (stock value) he didn’t know what to do</description>
					</item>
				
					<item>
						<title>Google&#039;s plan for radio</title>
						<link>http://www.rbr.com/features/viewpoints/10113.html</link>
						<category>VIEWPOINTS</category>
						<pubDate>Sun, 21 Sep 2008 17:59:00 -0500</pubDate>
						<description>Almost as quietly as it began, Google celebrated its 10th birthday this past September. Hard to believe the search giant has become an advertising business heavyweight in just</description>
					</item>
				
					<item>
						<title>Russo on “The Fall of Citadel”</title>
						<link>http://www.rbr.com/features/viewpoints/rich_russo_russo_on_the_fall_of_citadel.html</link>
						<category>VIEWPOINTS</category>
						<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 23:29:00 -0500</pubDate>
						<description>JL Media’s Rich Russo had a few thoughts on a recent anonymous article about Citadel from a former ABC Radio Networks employee. &amp;quot;I read with horror and a dropped jaw the article</description>
					</item>
				
					<item>
						<title>The fall of Citadel</title>
						<link>http://www.rbr.com/features/viewpoints/the_fall_of_citadel.html</link>
						<category>VIEWPOINTS</category>
						<pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 12:21:00 -0500</pubDate>
						<description>RBR recently received this scathing review from a former ABC Radio employee, who is still working in the industry and must remain anonymous. You will no doubt find it an interesting read</description>
					</item>
				
					<item>
						<title>The Network Exception and Political Rates</title>
						<link>http://www.rbr.com/features/viewpoints/skall_network_exception_and_political_rates.html</link>
						<category>VIEWPOINTS</category>
						<pubDate>Sun, 14 Sep 2008 13:03:00 -0500</pubDate>
						<description>We’re into the home stretch of the 2008 political season and the presidential election is upon us.   Radio is receiving more attention than</description>
					</item>
				
					<item>
						<title>Political Advertisements: A Quick Review of Broadcasters’ Obligations</title>
						<link>http://www.rbr.com/features/viewpoints/9839.html</link>
						<category>VIEWPOINTS</category>
						<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 23:31:00 -0500</pubDate>
						<description>Are issue ads entitle to lowest unit rate? Is the broadcaster exempt from liability for false statements? Must the broadcaster</description>
					</item>
				
					<item>
						<title>The Old Days</title>
						<link>http://www.rbr.com/features/viewpoints/9793.html</link>
						<category>VIEWPOINTS</category>
						<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 13:16:00 -0500</pubDate>
						<description>First, I am not one who always is looking back on the “good ole’ days” but I am one who has gone from playing scratchy 45’s* to music on hard drive.  Spots on carts that would jam</description>
					</item>
				
			
		
<description></description>
</channel>
</rss>