<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:base="http://www.rbr.com/">
	<title type="text"></title>
	<id>http://www.rbr.com/</id>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" hreflang="en" href="index.php" />
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.rbr.com/feed/features/viewpoints/17967.atom" />
	<rights>&amp;copy;2007 Spoonlabs d.o.o.</rights>
	<generator>Vivvo CMS 4.1</generator>
	<updated>2012-02-11T23:37:59-06:00</updated>
	
			
				
					<entry>
						
							<title>Another man&#039;s opinion of Fox v. Obama</title>
							<id>http://www.rbr.com/features/viewpoints/17967.html</id>
							<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" hreflang="en" href="features/viewpoints/17967.html" />
							<published>2009-10-22T13:26:00-05:00</published>
							<updated>2009-10-22T13:26:00-05:00</updated>
							<author>
								<name>Dave Seyler</name>
							</author>
							<category term="tech" scheme="http://www.rbr.com/features/viewpoints/17967.html" label="tech" ></category>
							<content type="html">This is the second letter you printed from David Handler attempt to picture FOX News as a legitimate news organization. Recently I wrote a couple of responses and never emailed them but</content>
							
						
					</entry>
					
							
								
									<entry>
										
											<title>George</title>
											<id>http://www.rbr.com/features/viewpoints/17967.html</id>
											<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" hreflang="en" href="features/viewpoints/17967.html" />
											<published>2009-10-23T05:42:07-05:00</published>
											<updated>2009-10-23T05:42:07-05:00</updated>
											<author>
												<name>George</name>
											</author>
											<category term="tech" scheme="http://www.rbr.com/features/viewpoints/17967.html" label="tech" ></category>
											<content type="html">&amp;quot;Made up news stories...&amp;quot; How about some examples? Perhaps Dan Rather can share some &amp;quot;documents&amp;quot; with you to prove your point.</content>
											
										
									</entry>
								
									<entry>
										
											<title>Scott Todd</title>
											<id>http://www.rbr.com/features/viewpoints/17967.html</id>
											<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" hreflang="en" href="features/viewpoints/17967.html" />
											<published>2009-10-23T08:35:56-05:00</published>
											<updated>2009-10-23T08:35:56-05:00</updated>
											<author>
												<name>Scott Todd</name>
											</author>
											<category term="tech" scheme="http://www.rbr.com/features/viewpoints/17967.html" label="tech" ></category>
											<content type="html">That FOX reporter may have stirred the crowd up for the TV cameras, but they sure as heck didn&amp;#039;t stage any of these events- HUGE difference.</content>
											
										
									</entry>
								
									<entry>
										
											<title>Marshall Stax</title>
											<id>http://www.rbr.com/features/viewpoints/17967.html</id>
											<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" hreflang="en" href="features/viewpoints/17967.html" />
											<published>2009-10-23T09:39:42-05:00</published>
											<updated>2009-10-23T09:39:42-05:00</updated>
											<author>
												<name>Marshall Stax</name>
											</author>
											<category term="tech" scheme="http://www.rbr.com/features/viewpoints/17967.html" label="tech" ></category>
											<content type="html">As a reporter (Rick Sanchez) on CNN pointed out, Fox &amp;quot;promoted&amp;quot; the Tea Baggers protest in DC rather than &amp;quot;cover&amp;quot; it, as the other networks did.  And as Jon Stewart so perfectly pointed out, Fox couldn&amp;#039;t be bothered to send a reporter or camera crew to the equally large LGBT demo in DC a few weeks later (they used a clip from ABC news to illustrate their oh-so-brief report on it) yet they did send a reporter/crew to cover an empty lawn where some small Tea Baggers protest had happened earlier.   The biggest beef a lot of us have with Fox is their bald-faced lie to being &amp;quot;fair and balanced&amp;quot; when they are anything but.  If they would just admit what they&amp;#039;re about and stop the pretense, all would be fine.  CBN News is very upfront about their Christian perspective and no one has an issue with them.  People and networks are entitled to have opinions and biases, but they should fess up to them and get on with it.</content>
											
										
									</entry>
								
									<entry>
										
											<title>Dale Weston</title>
											<id>http://www.rbr.com/features/viewpoints/17967.html</id>
											<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" hreflang="en" href="features/viewpoints/17967.html" />
											<published>2009-10-23T10:35:54-05:00</published>
											<updated>2009-10-23T10:35:54-05:00</updated>
											<author>
												<name>Dale Weston</name>
											</author>
											<category term="tech" scheme="http://www.rbr.com/features/viewpoints/17967.html" label="tech" ></category>
											<content type="html">Why are some in the media so blatant in their love affair with this administration? TV news ratings are tanking the more their bias shows. Fox, on the other hand is growing because they at least share a different viewpoint.Caution to all that drink either sides cool-aid when it comes to coverage, because sooner or later this administration may bear down on all media outlets, regardless if you are not Fox and an Obama groupie like CBS, NBC, ABC along with the cable TV CNN, MSNBC etc, etc.Debating the issues is what the press does. Check the history books that were written 30-years ago before the bias.</content>
											
										
									</entry>
								
									<entry>
										
											<title>Chuck Dunning</title>
											<id>http://www.rbr.com/features/viewpoints/17967.html</id>
											<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" hreflang="en" href="features/viewpoints/17967.html" />
											<published>2009-10-23T12:06:21-05:00</published>
											<updated>2009-10-23T12:06:21-05:00</updated>
											<author>
												<name>Chuck Dunning</name>
											</author>
											<category term="tech" scheme="http://www.rbr.com/features/viewpoints/17967.html" label="tech" ></category>
											<content type="html">In the end, this or any administration should just let Fox do its thing. The more they point to Fox, the bigger Fox&amp;#039;s pulpit.</content>
											
										
									</entry>
								
									<entry>
										
											<title>Chuck Shiflett</title>
											<id>http://www.rbr.com/features/viewpoints/17967.html</id>
											<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" hreflang="en" href="features/viewpoints/17967.html" />
											<published>2009-10-23T13:15:17-05:00</published>
											<updated>2009-10-23T13:15:17-05:00</updated>
											<author>
												<name>Chuck Shiflett</name>
											</author>
											<category term="tech" scheme="http://www.rbr.com/features/viewpoints/17967.html" label="tech" ></category>
											<content type="html">Beck, O&amp;#039;Reilly and Hannity are opinion shows. They are not the news department. Even Hillary Clinton stated that Fox was more balanced in its election coverage than the other networks and independent research has proved this out. You want fake? MSNBC doing a piece on the radical white racists carrying guns to town hall meetings and in the background they show a man with an assault style weapon slung over his shoulder in the middle of the crowd. But they would not show him from the shoulders up. Why? Because he was black and that would shoot down their theory of the angry white male. Fortunately other also had this video with the head show and pointed out the bias of MSNBC.</content>
											
										
									</entry>
								
									<entry>
										
											<title>Rev Wright</title>
											<id>http://www.rbr.com/features/viewpoints/17967.html</id>
											<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" hreflang="en" href="features/viewpoints/17967.html" />
											<published>2009-10-23T13:43:32-05:00</published>
											<updated>2009-10-23T13:43:32-05:00</updated>
											<author>
												<name>Rev Wright</name>
											</author>
											<category term="tech" scheme="http://www.rbr.com/features/viewpoints/17967.html" label="tech" ></category>
											<content type="html">Don Surath is a media consultant? Well, I&amp;#039;m a White House observer.After this, he&amp;#039;ll get as many calls from the media as I&amp;#039;ll get from the White House.</content>
											
										
									</entry>
								
									<entry>
										
											<title>C J</title>
											<id>http://www.rbr.com/features/viewpoints/17967.html</id>
											<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" hreflang="en" href="features/viewpoints/17967.html" />
											<published>2009-10-23T21:09:49-05:00</published>
											<updated>2009-10-23T21:09:49-05:00</updated>
											<author>
												<name>C J</name>
											</author>
											<category term="tech" scheme="http://www.rbr.com/features/viewpoints/17967.html" label="tech" ></category>
											<content type="html">A few weeks ago I was on a cruise and only had access to Fox news.  I was amazed that the coverage was so slanted against the President.  Even with what purported to be coverage of current news items, so-called experts were interviewed who had an obvious anti-Obama bias.Ayles has been extremely successful in creating  what matters most to his employer - ratings which translate into revenue.  It has been clear for some time that far right radio personalities are much more popular than personalities to the left.  Ayles has leverged that into TV.It makes money but it certainly is not good journalism.</content>
											
										
									</entry>
								
							
						
				
			
		
</feed>
