<rss version="2.0" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/">
<channel>
	<generator>Vivvo CMS 4.1</generator>
	<title></title>
	<link>http://www.rbr.com/</link>
	<copyright>&amp;copy;2010 Spoonlabs d.o.o.</copyright>
	
	
			
				
					<item>
						
							<title>Congressional foes of retransmission negotiation fall flat</title>
							<link>http://www.rbr.com/media-news/washington-beat/26283.html</link>
							<category>WASHINGTON BEAT</category>
							<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 16:44:00 -0400</pubDate>
							<description>New York Reps Steve Israel (D-NY) and Pete King (R-NY) recently wrote a “dear colleague” letter bemoaning the process by which broadcasters and MVPDs</description>
							
						
					</item>
					
							
								
									<item>
										<title>Dave</title>
										
										<category>WASHINGTON BEAT</category>
										<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 08:47:21 -0400</pubDate>
										<description>OK.  I&amp;#039;ll bite.  What is fair compensation?  Eleven cents per subscriber?$1 per subscriber?  $2 per subscriber?Should it be more if you can rig your agreement to expire the day of the Super Bowl or Academy Awards?Should a law be passed through congress that creates a pool for local broadcasters that is divided up by Nielsen ratings with each station getting its &amp;quot;fair&amp;quot; share based on its portion of network and non-network viewing?   How</description>
									</item>
								
							
						
				
			
		




<description></description>
</channel>
</rss>
