<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:base="http://www.rbr.com/">
	<title type="text"></title>
	<id>http://www.rbr.com/</id>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" hreflang="en" href="index.php" />
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.rbr.com/feed/radio/11341.atom" />
	<rights>&amp;copy;2007 Spoonlabs d.o.o.</rights>
	<generator>Vivvo CMS 4.1</generator>
	<updated>2012-02-11T16:40:23-06:00</updated>
	
			
				
					<entry>
						
							<title>Nielsen jumps into radio measurement</title>
							<id>http://www.rbr.com/radio/11341.html</id>
							<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" hreflang="en" href="radio/11341.html" />
							<published>2008-11-17T19:14:00-06:00</published>
							<updated>2008-11-17T19:14:00-06:00</updated>
							<author>
								<name>Jack Messmer</name>
							</author>
							<category term="tech" scheme="http://www.rbr.com/radio/11341.html" label="tech" ></category>
							<content type="html">Look out Arbitron! Thereâ€™s a new competitor in US radio ratings â€“ and a big one. Cumulus Media has completed its RFP process for ratings in its markets</content>
							
						
					</entry>
					
							
								
									<entry>
										
											<title>Charlie Ferguson</title>
											<id>http://www.rbr.com/radio/11341.html</id>
											<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" hreflang="en" href="radio/11341.html" />
											<published>2008-11-18T08:56:16-06:00</published>
											<updated>2008-11-18T08:56:16-06:00</updated>
											<author>
												<name>Charlie Ferguson</name>
											</author>
											<category term="tech" scheme="http://www.rbr.com/radio/11341.html" label="tech" ></category>
											<content type="html">Nielsen entering the Radio audience measurement arena is a good thing.  The next thing is to make sure the agency buying software will be able to use Nielsen research to be the currency of the marketplace.  I&amp;#039;m guessing Arbitron&amp;#039;s widely used agency probram, &amp;quot;SmartPlus,&amp;quot; isn&amp;#039;t going to run Nielsen ratings.  While our market isn&amp;#039;t on the initial list of 50, I&amp;#039;d certainly entertain a presentation from Nielsen for the Traverse City/Petoskey, MI market!</content>
											
										
									</entry>
								
									<entry>
										
											<title>Mike W</title>
											<id>http://www.rbr.com/radio/11341.html</id>
											<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" hreflang="en" href="radio/11341.html" />
											<published>2008-11-18T18:37:47-06:00</published>
											<updated>2008-11-18T18:37:47-06:00</updated>
											<author>
												<name>Mike W</name>
											</author>
											<category term="tech" scheme="http://www.rbr.com/radio/11341.html" label="tech" ></category>
											<content type="html">Stickers &amp;amp; once a year measurement in 2009? We might as well go back to rotary phones and dot-matrix printers â€“ because this is a step backwards not a step forwardâ€¦.Advertisers want CURRENT information â€“ they want to evaluate choices based off what is going on now â€“ More importantly - Radio talks about competing in a digital world â€“ a world where audience measurement is immediate - so the way to do this is by expecting people to sit at home peel a sticker off one sheet and put it on another sheet?  And then go to the mailbox and mail that information back?  Where is the nearest mailbox to your house?  I canâ€™t even make a guess â€“ with email, on-line bill payment, magazines on-line â€“ except for birthday cards/gifts and jury duty summons â€“ if mail stopped being delivered to me tomorrow â€“ I wouldnâ€™t even notice â€“ correction â€“ I be happy â€“ no more junk mail.If you thought a 3 month average that looked back to the past was bad - once a year measurement is a joke.  Hope stations don&amp;#039;t make any major programming changes after the survey comes out â€“ if they do they will be hearing a lot of &amp;quot;your numbers are the old format, programming, etc come back when you have numbers that reflect what you have on the air.Forget about measuring programs/events that run outside the survey period â€“ like sports, elections, x-mass music, major local news events etc.Radio has been battling an image that it is old - that it isn&amp;#039;t as cutting edge or as hip as digital media - well a once a year &amp;quot;sticker&amp;quot; measurement system doesn&amp;#039;t do a lot to help that image problem.</content>
											
										
									</entry>
								
									<entry>
										
											<title>Thomas McDaniel</title>
											<id>http://www.rbr.com/radio/11341.html</id>
											<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" hreflang="en" href="radio/11341.html" />
											<published>2009-06-17T19:11:53-05:00</published>
											<updated>2009-06-17T19:11:53-05:00</updated>
											<author>
												<name>Thomas McDaniel</name>
											</author>
											<category term="tech" scheme="http://www.rbr.com/radio/11341.html" label="tech" ></category>
											<content type="html">I was asked to participate in the radio survey for the Nielsen Radio for the Macon Georgia area. I received all the materials containing instructions and listening logs for me to fill out for a week. My son and I completed all the information as requested and mailed it back in by the requested date. As of this date June 17, 2009, have not received the payment I was promised and itâ€™s been quite some time now. I was wondering how I might find out why I have not received what I was promised to do the survey for Nielsen.</content>
											
										
									</entry>
								
							
						
				
			
		
</feed>
