http://www.rbr.com/ ©2007 Spoonlabs d.o.o. Vivvo CMS 4.1 2012-02-11T17:22:16-06:00 http://www.rbr.com/radio/15120.html 2009-06-11T15:47:00-05:00 2009-06-11T15:47:00-05:00 Dave Seyler Members of Congress, the FCC and consumer/watchdog groups all seemed to think making it easier to license LPFM stations by eliminating 3rd adjacency interference protection was a good idea – and http://www.rbr.com/radio/15120.html 2009-06-12T16:17:04-05:00 2009-06-12T16:17:04-05:00 Greg Jablonski It SHOULDN'T be OK to run a translator on a third adjacent channel, and that's the problem. Interference thresholds should be CONSISTENTLY defined by desired to undesired signal ratios, not FCC administrative descriptions like "translator," "LPFM," or "full-power FM." Unfortunately, the FCC likes to try to defy the laws of physics in furthering its agenda.