<rss version="2.0" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/">
<channel>
	<generator>Vivvo CMS 4.1</generator>
	<title></title>
	<link>http://www.rbr.com/</link>
	<copyright>&amp;copy;2010 Spoonlabs d.o.o.</copyright>
	
	
			
				
					<item>
						
							<title>Clear Channel slammed for control of WOLL</title>
							<link>http://www.rbr.com/radio/18777.html</link>
							<category>Radio News</category>
							<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 16:45:00 -0500</pubDate>
							<description>Vero Beach Broadcasters found much to dislike about Clear Channel Broadcasting maneuverings in the West Palm Beach and Fort Pierce-Stuart-Vero</description>
							
						
					</item>
					
							
								
									<item>
										<title>Robert Christy</title>
										
										<category>Radio News</category>
										<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 15:03:20 -0500</pubDate>
										<description>&amp;quot;nobody can look into the corporate soul and devine intent&amp;quot; Please, what planet are you publishing from?</description>
									</item>
								
									<item>
										<title>dave seyler</title>
										
											<link>http://rbr.com</link>
										
										<category>Radio News</category>
										<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 15:32:35 -0500</pubDate>
										<description>Allow me to clarify -- nobody can &amp;quot;look into the corporate soul&amp;quot; in a way that will stand up in court. I was kind of hoping this story would generate some comment. VBB has some very obvious complaints, and it is kind of amazing that you can &amp;quot;move&amp;quot; two stations from Ft. Pierce to West Palm without moving them at all. But what&amp;#039;s the FCC supposed to do? It has to enforce the rules as written and what Clear Channel did was perfectly legal. Should the rules be changed? Should there be some other subjective standard brought to bear in cases like this? Tell us...</description>
									</item>
								
									<item>
										<title>jerry smith</title>
										
										<category>Radio News</category>
										<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 18:11:49 -0500</pubDate>
										<description>You cannot look into the &amp;#039;bidness is bidness&amp;#039; corporate soul because there is no soul having been sold out for wooden boy&amp;#039;s legal life and limited liability clause. And while it is essential that Clear Channel survive for the sake of this industry, the damage done to the spectrum from wholesale technical no-speak, no-think tanks and the lives of men and women from the wholesale &amp;quot;ingathering&amp;quot; sales, marketing and programming concept across America by some of the larger players will never ever be healed. &amp;quot;Never Again&amp;quot; is a war chant for racism and mass graves around the world. But it should be implanted in these new &amp;quot;beast marks&amp;quot; just for the sake of sanity and the best interests of humanity. Never again should one owner have the power to hit the market and &amp;quot;take it or leave it&amp;quot; to the free market ad community. Good people gone, some good people remain. But the net result of the Reagan concept that government can be smaller and trusted has been proven via Resolution Trust and the recent Fed Takeovers to be a corporate lie starting at the elected- and-bought level all the way down to the weekend high school DJ now working in CS at Walmart for his musical thrills.</description>
									</item>
								
									<item>
										<title>Don Skylar</title>
										
										<category>Radio News</category>
										<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 01:24:34 -0500</pubDate>
										<description>&amp;quot;Clear Channel&amp;quot;, AGAIN....Some things never change.</description>
									</item>
								
							
						
				
			
		




<description></description>
</channel>
</rss>
