Home | Media News | Watchdog calls for more public funding

Watchdog calls for more public funding

Font size: Decrease font Enlarge font

Free Press’s Craig Aaron thinks public broadcasting gets short shrift in the US, and is calling on a Democratic White House and Congress to do something about it. And he’s not just talking about NPR, PBS and CPB. He has LPFM and other community broadcast outlets, public access channels, satellite channels, and funding for independent producers, publications and websites on his list.

He said America pays only $1.37 per person on public media at the moment. He’s not asking for the $80 per person they spend in Great Britain, or even the $22 per they spend in Canada, and certainly not the $565 per person we all spent already to bail out AIG.

He believes that $5 per person would work wonders funding local publicly supported media and the creation of new works of art.

He believes there will be a second round of stimulus at some point. Unlike the last round, where existing public operations seemed happy just avoiding cuts, he thinks an investment should be made to buck up the entire system.

RBR/TVBR observation: We don’t expect anything like this to happen anytime soon, but if the situation in Washington remains stable for eight or more years, anything could happen eventually.

Have an opinion on this article? Post your comment below.

Bookmark and Share

Today's Broadcasting News

RBR - Radio News
TVBR - TV/Cable News




Subscribe to comments feed Comments (5 posted):

dale weston on 04 September, 2009 12:05:23
avatar
More money for what? They already abuse the tax payer with non-American-left-wing information that is an outright slap in the face. If they ran more non-bias political programming maybe they would receive more donations from the public.

Commercial broadcast radio and TV use the rating system to check and balance their content in order to maintain their advertising revenue base with no handouts or bailouts.

Much like the "failure to launch" 40-year old adults still living with their parents, public broadcasting needs to grow up, move on and get real and to stop always looking for more handouts.
Thumbs Up Thumbs Down
-2
Lynne Gillooly on 04 September, 2009 04:11:42
avatar
90 percent of our AM airwaves is so called Conservative. What it actually is is propaganda for the right and corporate intersts.They frame and drive the political debate becuase they saturate and repeat all day every day their talking points. Sadly, facts are optional with Rush, Beck, Hannity, Savage etc. Then when they finish a local like minded parroting host saturates and repeats the same noise and propaganda. How did 90 percent of stations get that much power for one point of view? Why is there no accountability if they lie or incite hatred towards our Govt or President? This is the cause of so much hatred and partisanship in this Country today and something must be done. They are petrified of a Fairness Doctrine because this power will diminish.
Thumbs Up Thumbs Down
1
Rich Potter on 04 September, 2009 04:17:07
avatar
There's no reason that the politicians have to decide where public media funding goes. Dean Baker has proposed letting each taxpayer direct a certain amount of their taxes to a nonprofit media outlet of their choice.

http://www.niemanlab.org/2009/08/a-plan-to-support-creative-work-100-government-dollars-at-a-time/

Dale could give his portion to whatever he considers a pro-American-right-wing outlet, and I could give mine to whoever is willing to get Reading Rainbow back on the air. (Is Reading Rainbow really a biased political program, Dale?)
Thumbs Up Thumbs Down
1
Gerry Long on 05 September, 2009 08:14:36
avatar
It is outrageous to realize that commercial TV and radio use the public air-waves, which are "owned by the citizens" and pay not a cent for the use, but pocket billions of dollars in profits from use of those air-waves. We have hundred of channels, most of which produce cultural garbage. Only PBS provides an iota of intellectual content. A tax on the profits of commercial TV and radio could amply fund better quality of public broadcasting. Anyone who thinks PBS is "left leaning" is out-to-lunch on this matter and has been brain washed by Fox News and Clear-Channel radio.
Thumbs Up Thumbs Down
1
Dennis Nilsson on 10 September, 2009 02:24:42
avatar
I'm living in Sweden and appreciate PBS programming through Internet. PBS produce great documentarys, like Nova, Nature, Special, Wired Science, Bill Moyers and others.

In my view, PBS programming is better than most of the commercial TV in U.S. and Sweden.

Sorry that we outlanders couldn't send PBS donations.

You Don't Know What You Have Until You Lose It.
Thumbs Up Thumbs Down
0

Post your comment comment

Please enter the code you see in the image:

  • email Email to a friend
  • print Print version
Log in


RBR-TVBR readers rejected PRA negotiations two weeks ago. 8/23 NAB explained the proposal and wants the industry’s opinion, so we’ve simplified the answers and we're putting it before you again:
Submit your own poll Email production@rbr.com
www.harkerresearch.com




Facebook

Twitter

Rate this article
0