Home | Media News | Copps issues challenge to responsible broadcasters

Copps issues challenge to responsible broadcasters

Font size: Decrease font Enlarge font
image Michael Copps

The stance of Democratic Commissioner Michael Copps on media ownership is well known. He is a harsh critic of media consolidation, and sees very little good that has come from it. At the same time he recognizes the excellent work done by many in the broadcast community. At the 11/2/09 ownership workshop, he issued a challenge to the excellent – use this ownership review to stand up and make the case for strong local service.

His position is simple – in his view consolidated station groups with distant headquarters, focused on the bottom-line, Wall Street and massive debt-service, have been dropping the ball on serving their local communities and producing quality journalism, and he says this trend was already under way years before the recession rocked the economy.

When such a company is in the market with a committed local or regional broadcaster, it puts competitive pressure on the smaller local company that makes it much more difficult for the local company to survive, much less thrive, and diminishes its ability to continue maintaining high quality local content.

RBR-TVBR observation: We’ve heard complaints over the years from smaller broadcasters, who make up the vast majority of licensees. It’s easy for a consolidated, multi-market company, with a lot of stations in a local market, to do things to make life miserable for its smaller competitors. It can drive rates down, it can attack specifically-formatted stations, it can outbid locals for sports and quality syndication programming, it can throw in temporary game-changing amounts of cash, it can do all kinds of things.

Is this a problem? The FCC wants to know, and so do we. The space to state your case is right below this paragraph. Please share your thoughts.

Have an opinion on this article? Post your comment below.

Bookmark and Share

Today's Broadcasting News

RBR - Radio News
TVBR - TV/Cable News




Subscribe to comments feed Comments (5 posted):

Philip Lizotte on 2009-11-02 15:53:47
avatar
Commissioner Copps is correct. Large consolidators have used their vast resources to invest in programming gimmicks that favor the Arbitron survey's mode of audience measurement. Outside marketing, cash promotions, and intimidation of local business people have been some of the tactics employed in my market of Lafayette, LA. One of the consolidators has resorted to sending email to my clients asking them why they advertise on my station, since THEY obviously have a larger audience as measured by Arbitron, and that they couldn't possibly be getting results with us. The whole consolidation scenario has resulted in radio stations fighting among themselves for advertising dollars, while the public is underserved.
Thumbs Up Thumbs Down
0
Carlos Montana on 2009-11-03 05:34:48
avatar
Why not return to the 7-7-7 total ownership rule (7 tv, 7am, 7fm) and the one service to a market rule (1 tv, 1am, 1fm)? It should be phased in over 5 years and would allow for the transfer of licenses to a more diverse ownership. This would meet the goal of diversity and localism.
Thumbs Up Thumbs Down
1
Lee Van Dam on 2009-11-03 07:38:10
avatar
Yes, and the next time your dog goes missing or you want to know about the fire on the other end of town, call that "DJ" or ancr. at the studio, (I mean the guy in NY or LA.) Local radio is GOOD radio.
Thumbs Up Thumbs Down
1
Dennis Jackson on 2009-11-03 09:01:00
avatar
When we started WMEX in Rochester, NH in 2002, we sold a remote to a new local building supply store for $1000. The greedy ba***rds from Cheep Channel came in and said, "Don't pay WMEX... we'll do it for free on our 6th station over in Maine, which can be heard here." The client bit.

An uninformed jock showed up in the station van with their idiot prize wheel to give away bumper stickers. The remote failed, no one came, and the client never used radio again.

Thanks a lot for nothing, Cheep Channel.
Thumbs Up Thumbs Down
2
Scott Todd on 2009-11-03 09:15:42
avatar
7-7-7 is WAY too restrictive especially given the number of stations there is now, though certainly it needs to be seriously pared back. Certainly cut the number of stations one entity can own in a market in half. There needs to be some allowance for duopolies as otherwise we'll have a lot of stations going dark.
Thumbs Up Thumbs Down
1

Post your comment comment

Please enter the code you see in the image:

  • email Email to a friend
  • print Print version
Log in



Is your radio/TV station experiencing a recovery from the recession?
www.harkerresearch.com



Facebook

Twitter

Rate this article
0