Home | Radio News | Clear Channel still pushing for bigger local cap

Clear Channel still pushing for bigger local cap

Font size: Decrease font Enlarge font
image
In comments to the FCC requesting that an HD tuner be included in interoperable satellite radio receivers, Clear Channel lamented that there have not even been modest modifications in local ownership rules to allow AM and FM radio stations to continue to compete effectively. CC reminds the FCC that free radio is of critical importance to the public, particularly in times of emergency, and that the FCC needs to protect its competitive footing; that adoption of HD technology is a critical element of competiveness going forward; and that therefore all satellite receivers need to be able to pick up HD signals.

In the summary of its filing, Clear Channel wrote, “Moreover, the Commission’s harmful decisions to retain without even very modest modification its local radio ownership rules despite evidence of abundant competition and to bless the formation of a monopoly SDARS have severely tilted the market against free local radio, undermining the longstanding policy goals of promoting competitive, locally-focused and diverse audio programming. The magnitude and competitive importance of the spectrum advantage conferred upon Sirius XM by the Commission’s approval of their merger cannot be overstated. Sirius can now provide more than 300 possible channels in every local market, or two to three times the number of channels as all of the local radio broadcast channels (AM and FM) combined in that market.”

RBR/TVBR observation: The HD issue should have been dealt with when the monopoly was granted. But there have been odd moves since. We remember the Ed Markey bill that would require HD capability on satellite receivers, but only when they already have analog AM/FM tuners. We suspect that would lead to a lot of 100% satellite/0% terrestrial receivers. It’s a loophole we think needs to be fixed. Have an opinion on this article? Post your comment below.

Bookmark and Share

Today's Broadcasting News

RBR - Radio News
TVBR - TV/Cable News




Subscribe to comments feed Comments (1 posted):

John Terhar on 2008-11-20 13:33:46
avatar
This whole issue is the darndest thing I have ever heard. Is C C forgetting the part where subscribers pay $ 13+ per month for the sat radio service? Why should they be forced to subsidise the failed experiment called "HD radio"? Is C C forgetting that the sat radio companies subsidise the auto makers to put sat ready radios in cars? Why doesn't C C pay the automakers to put HD radios in new cars? Hey, C C, I have an idea... Why don't you put programming on your free over the air channels that people want to hear and drive sat radio out of business? Why not compete and win rather than force sat radio to heavily tilt the playing field in your direction?
Thumbs Up Thumbs Down
0

Post your comment comment

Please enter the code you see in the image:

  • email Email to a friend
  • print Print version
Log in


Will the Performance Rights Act pass Congress this year?
www.harkerresearch.com


Facebook

Twitter

Rate this article
0