Home | Radio News | Radio industry needs new blood


Radio industry needs new blood

Font size: Decrease font Enlarge font
image

If there was one recurring theme at last week’s NAB Radio Show in Philadelphia, it was that radio leaders are well outside of the most attractive demos – and getting older. But consolidation and the current recession have made it difficult to hire and grow the leaders of tomorrow.

Regent Communications CEO Bill Stakelin raised the issue in the Radio Group Heads Super Session, putting himself among those radio executives who are getting “long in the tooth.”

The same concern was expressed over and over by speakers in the session called “Radio Stimulus Package.”

“We are fast becoming an industry of old men,” said Larry Rosin, President, Edison Media Research, excluding the only female and younger panelist, Heidi Raphael, Vice President Corporate Communications, Greater Media.

“We have to raise the quality of programming,” declared Bill Figenshu, President, Broadcast Operations and Development, Peak Broadcasting. He complained that program directors are currently managing too many stations, leaving them with little time for real innovation. He called for efforts to bring in more young people. “It’s time for radio to make stations we are proud of,” he said.

Raphael called on broadcasters to expand their outreach – not just going to colleges for recruiting, but also to high schools and junior high schools to get students interested in radio. “We need to be growing our talent now for the future,” she said.

“We have stopped investing in ourselves, so why do we expect anybody else to invest in radio, to use radio?” asked veteran morning host John DeBella, WMGK-FM Philadelphia. He suggested putting young staffers in charge of programming HD2 and HD3 channels, comparing it to the situation decades ago when young people were allowed to program the FM stations that no one cared about while the AM cash cows drove business. “Let’s build a farm team,” he declared.

“Stop nostalgically looking back at the good old days,” said Fred Jacobs, President, Jacobs Media. He lamented the lack of strategic thinking in radio and declared that programming for PPM, because it measures audience minute by minute, is killing innovation. “It’s personalities that people care about,” Jacobs noted. But who is developing the new personalities that radio needs for the future?

John Parikhal, CEO, Joint Communications Corp., had harsh words for the current leaders of the largest radio groups. “Stop lying to yourselves,” he said. Parikhal declared that the top people have made mistakes and that none of the new initiatives implemented in recent years have worked. “Kill all czars,” he proclaimed, because rule by czars – top-down management – always fails. Instead, innovation has to come from the lower ranks and move up in the organization.

RBR-TVBR observation: At some point the broadcasting industry (OK, this is a bigger problem in radio, but it also applies to TV) is going to have to spend some money and recruit some of the best and brightest of the new generation.

That is obviously hard to do in the current economic climate. With some of the biggest players dancing as fast as they can to avoid Chapter 11 (and certainly some will end up there), spending more money is not something being talked about at many radio groups.

At some point, someone is going to have to actually invest in the product being put out on radio stations or they will just watch the value of their properties decrease. The capital structure of the radio industry is a mess right now, but that mess will be cleaned up – one way or the other. Groups will find new investors or merger partners to de-leverage, convert debt to equity to de-leverage or head to bankruptcy court and emerge de-leveraged.

Once the balance sheets are back in line, the radio companies had better invest in new people and new ideas. Otherwise, they’ll be back starring at the same financial mess again.

If your company has already made the tough moves to clean up the balance sheet – or never got overleveraged in the first place – now is the time to become a new radio leader. Focus less on cash flow margins and more on growth. Go out and compete with the new media companies to hire innovative young talent. Give them some latitude to try new things on digital platforms – online, HD Radio, mobile, and whatever else you can find.

Nurture that new talent and position your company to be a media leader. You’re not going to get there by hanging out in the bar at NAB conventions reminiscing about the days when you almost got fired for what you put on the air on an FM station in the 1970s.

Bottom line: It is time not to rethink this Fall NAB event but time to pack the bags and move... Move the event with the Spring conference and deliver content sessions that are relevant to today's media business. And not putting a half a dozen sessions in the same time slot. More is not better.

It is time to get the CEO's off the stage and put them in the audience in learning sessions by having key panels with experts in the field of digital etc. By the way, we will not find these experts in the radio or television business as many or most are still in the analog business.

The challenge moving forward is to push the envelope with creative ideas working now. NAB as an association is not at total fault as their mission is lobbying not sales, programming, digital, etc.  This is where the RAB and TVB have to kick in and again we as broadcasters have to reach across the aisle and work together.

Entering into 2010 now is the time to reinvent our radio and television medium. RBR-TVBR has a number of ideas if any member of the NAB board or RAB and TVB wish to listen as our job is to work with and help broadcasters daily as we too are broadcasters.

Have a comment? Please post below we need your input and share in the voice. 

Have an opinion on this article? Post your comment below.

Bookmark and Share

Today's Broadcasting News

RBR - Radio News
TVBR - TV/Cable News




Subscribe to comments feed Comments (15 posted):

Pocket Radio on 28 September, 2009 11:34:15
avatar
HD Radio - it's getting really old.
Thumbs Up Thumbs Down
2
Jim Carnegie on 29 September, 2009 05:11:54
avatar
It is time to get the CEO's off the stage and put them in the audience to learn... Time Not to rethink this Fall NAB but time to pack the bags and move..
Thumbs Up Thumbs Down
1
Mark OBrien on 29 September, 2009 07:47:13
avatar
The day radio started to go down hill was the day the industry was taken over by the 28 year old MBA. If it doesn't fit on a balance sheet it won't work. Radio can't make a decision today without the approval of the kid MBA. What do they teach these people at Harvard anyway?
Thumbs Up Thumbs Down
0
Rubin Rodriguez Jr. on 29 September, 2009 08:37:50
avatar
I started as an intern in the late 80's. I'm asked all the time, "How did you get started?". I explain that the mergers and acquisitions killed the new entries in broadcasting and locked out new ownership opportunities. One of our goals at the National Association of Community Broadcasters (NACB) is to assist the new breed of broadcasters. For more info go to NACB.info or info@nacb.info
Thumbs Up Thumbs Down
0
Gordon HAstings on 29 September, 2009 10:05:54
avatar
Almost a year ago when Radio Ink kindly presented me with their Lifetime Achievement Award I said to those assembeled, and most of them were on the recent NAB panel, it is time for a new generation of leadership. I refereed back to the new generation of radio leadership of the fifties that literally took over when the older generation stampeded into television. Turned out it was very, very good for radio with new faces like Bill Drake, Schulke, Sklar, Taylor on the programming side and so many others(Rosenfield, Ury, Burden, Luckoff, Kaplan,taking the reins of station management almost by default. "The hits just came on coming!" The truth is many of those bright young people are already at stations throughout the country. Might be a very good idea to tap some of them collectively to see exactly what new ideas could come from such a gathering.
See my blog for some interesting thoughts gordonhastings.tumblr.com
Gordon Hastings, President ghhMANAGEMENT
Thumbs Up Thumbs Down
2
Jeff Gonsales on 29 September, 2009 10:14:57
avatar
My take from Philly was that there was very little focus was on selling the benefits of Radio, or any success stories from the field. All the panelists/consultants have something to sell so they all talk about Radio's impending doom to the various digital platforms. There is a reason that Apple put an FM tuner on their new Nano and it is cool! I believe there should be panels made up of top sellers talking about their best sales, clients looking for good ideas, etc. The various vendors looking to sell their services should be in the exhibitors' hall, not trying position their product and services as the answer to revenue woes.
Thumbs Up Thumbs Down
0
Robert Smith on 29 September, 2009 11:51:31
avatar
The best and the brightest left Radio programming a long time ago and they won’t be coming back as long as the boring, predictable, homogenized, personality-less, passionless, overly-dependent on questionable research, targeted at audience-measuring technology instead of human emotion, lacking in any local focus programming that those afore-mentioned MBA’s have given us continues to rule the airwaves.

The best ideas almost never come with the kind of “proof” that the people who are currently running Radio feel they need before they can act. Creativity and intuition can’t be measured, assigned a numerical value, and plugged into a metric. Explorers have intuition. Inventors have intuition. Great leaders have intuition. MBA’s have numbers. And when those numbers are applied to programming all we get is the same old same old.

We need to give listeners a reason to tune in and stay tuned in. That requires creativity, and that requires risk, but all of our current programming research and methodology is focused on trying to eliminate risk and avoid causing tune-OUT. We need to stop trying to measure what listeners THINK they want and start giving them something new they can get passionate about.

Oh, and don’t ask creative, motivated people to waste their time with HD stations no one will ever hear. Where’s the job satisfaction in that?
Thumbs Up Thumbs Down
1
David Aamodt on 29 September, 2009 02:43:30
avatar
Corporate Radio kicked to the curb far too many good, make that great broadcasters. They're not coming back. They were the ones with "fire in the belly" for the radio industry. You replaced us with bean-counters and and "yes man" broaders. No Balls, No Blue Chip! Radio has turned into a tentative industry run by a bunch of lemmings. As I told the G.M. at the Cum-u-lus station I worked for, "We're in the advertising business, yet we don't practice what we preach! We don't advertise our stations to attract new listeners, or to get regular listeners to listen longer! Cum-u-lus and their ilk would rather be good hypocrites and just tell their sales staff to go out and tell advertisers and potential advertisers they need to advertise to expand their customer base and to get their regular customers to buy more often. As a person who spent over 30-years SUCCESSFULLY in the business, this ain't rocket science. It's common sense!
Thumbs Up Thumbs Down
0
Gordon Moul on 29 September, 2009 04:34:50
avatar
As a broker for radio stations I know how old the ownership & management of most radio stations is. We are gray that is the few who still have hair. When a small market station goes on the market the potential buyers are old men or old group owners, Very few new faces that want to own their own broadcasting business and financing today, well that's another comment. The industry would do well to think about a business continuation plan for the whole radio business or one day the last old owner will die with no one to buy the radio station but an investment group looking for cash flow.I really hate that thought.
Thumbs Up Thumbs Down
0
Bob VanDerheyden on 30 September, 2009 08:03:31
avatar
Naturally, I take issue with my friend Bill Stakelin's observation that management/owner age is an issue in radio's inability to grow and prosper.

It isn't age...it's attitude !!!!

If you look like you're 40. If you act like you're 40. If you work
like you're 40. You're 40.

Great new ideas filtered through experience lessen error
and accelerate success.

Bob VanDerheyden
Bold Gold Media Group
Thumbs Up Thumbs Down
0
Kevin Mashek on 30 September, 2009 12:08:14
avatar
Right! Another bunch of control freaks on a stage at the convention lamenting on what should be done. Radio's biggest problem "When all is said and done there is more said then done!!" None of those Radio Heads are ever going to let a young innovative mind change anything in their company. But you will keep talking about it for the next 10 years.
Thumbs Up Thumbs Down
0
Jim Carnegie on 30 September, 2009 02:18:47
avatar
Kevin can't agree with you more...
Thumbs Up Thumbs Down
0
Robert Smith on 01 October, 2009 09:40:26
avatar
Kevin - Or for that matter an "old" experienced, proven successful in the past, innovative mind who got booted out when "innovative" got re-branded as "not a team player."
Thumbs Up Thumbs Down
0
Ed Esposito on 03 October, 2009 12:01:26
avatar
As usual thought provoking observations, Jim but this also goes beyond the PD's (and I'd add news directors and anyone dealing with talent) as well; the past 13 years since dereg have allowed the industry to forsake the next gen of talent and the professional "farm clubs" and it is disturbing to see how many colleges/universities are pulling away from "radio" programs. There is still great opportunity if we're willing to work with the "audio" programs, however, of local schools where the web has trumped the stick. The industry needs to support those links to local educators and provide platforms for these creative and energized students to make the transition from student-run to professional media -- regardless of platform -- especially in the audio/radio/streaming field. The challenge to our existing mentality is actually putting our effort (and money) behind the talk of workplace development, including the bench, instead of complaining how we can't find anyone anymore. They're out there...they just don't think of us anymore because we stopped thinking of them.
Thumbs Up Thumbs Down
0
Ray Somich on 03 October, 2009 12:55:00
avatar
One well-written commentary and thus far 14 posts basically agree that radio is broke and must be fixed. While we were patting ourselves on the back, we have already lost 2 generations of radio listeners. And despite the official numbers on how many people still use radio, we have very few truly passionate listeners.Who else remembers when we couldn't wait to turn on the radio? It is not that way any more. But this is about more than technology and how our owners and managers are stale. MOST OF OUR PROGRAMMING NO LONGER ADDS VALUE. The world has changed so much, and continues to do so. How can we possibly believe our outdated formats, sounders and bad jokes can still satisfy our old listeners or new ones? And yet, when I present new programming concepts to PD's and GM's, they won't even consider them. Technology will not render this great medium obsolete, but our close-mindedness will.
Thumbs Up Thumbs Down
0

Post your comment comment

Please enter the code you see in the image:

  • email Email to a friend
  • print Print version
Log in


RBR-TVBR readers rejected PRA negotiations two weeks ago. 8/23 NAB explained the proposal and wants the industry’s opinion, so we’ve simplified the answers and we're putting it before you again:
Submit your own poll Email production@rbr.com
www.harkerresearch.com




Facebook

Twitter

Rate this article
5.00