Radio vet fears LPFM onslaught
All-around radio veteran and current blogger Mel Phillips believes that Congress has lost its mind with its plan to fill the airwaves with LPFM stations. Count him as one who is not convinced that 3rd channel adjacency can safely be abandoned. But he seems to be concerned not only with that, but with the clutter that will exist on the dial in general.
“If you think our country’s airlanes are overcrowded, wait till you see the logjam of radio signals we’ll be getting,” he blogged recently. “Washington will be forced to use radar screens to scan all the radio frequencies we’ll have.”
He’s advising whoever reads his work to contact their representatives in Congress and try to get the LPFM bill defeated.
Today's Broadcasting News |
Log in
|
|||


Most Popular - Top 10 List
- Radio: The original social media
- YES is best but a NO is good too
- Analysts bullish on Clear Channel bonds
- Man shot after taking hostages at Discovery Communications HQ
- Philadelphia journalist prays for PRA to enable FM mobile chip
- Mediator appointed for Tribune Company bankruptcy
- WFAN NYC announces winner of Fantasy Phenom Challenge
- 29 million watched President Obama declare end of Iraq War
- RIAA’s Mitch Bainwol not including terrestrial royalties in revenue calculus
- ASCAP launches app for iPhone, iPad and iPod Touch
Rate this article



My background has been entirely in Christian NCE radio and TV. I am an expert in LPFM; Mr. Phillips is not. Broadcasting is big and diverse enough for both of us to exist at the same time
If the FCC would break up the mega-clusters, there would be no need for LPFM; every would-be broadcaster could obtain a channel.
The FCC should be abolished and we should start over. We need a regulator that is responsible; not the political system we have today. Solid engineering should rule. The present FCC is regulator, prosecutor, and judge. There is no justice under such a system.
It's time for a change NOW!
I live in an area where several stations are airing on the 'next' adjacent channels, and large stations have several 'translators' currently doing the same for FM as well.
SUPPOSEDLY, the newer stations and translators are outside the 'protected' zone of the original stations, yet, on all of my radios, I get cross channel noise of the adjacent channels --- 99.1 and 99.3, 92.1 and 92.3 for example --- unless I am sitting [almost] underneath their transmitters.
(One primary FM station moved their transmitter to a TALL mountain out here well in line with the primary station it now interferes with; one AM station dropped power for 20 minutes in the daytime and I picked up 3 OTHER stations at least 100 miles NORTH and WEST of OUR station clearer than OUR station when operating.)
I would be VERY HIP to enjoy some LPFM stations that are not regulated by Arbitron --- you think most mainline stations could live w/o being able to show that they are getting numbers anymore????? Out here only a baby handful of stations do air something that is not 'mainline'. (You should hear the [lack of] diverse commercials on those stations --- I know by heart the 'karaeoke drunk' PSA due to one of them --- as though the station is popular, it is LOCAL and a low(er) power AM, so the numbers do not come out as high as the ten stations that play 'Christine Aguilera'.) Luckily, the stations are not looking to 'bloat' their pockets, which, does make a case for LPFM and even a few AM stations being those small AM stations do broadcast LOCALLY compared to the high power stations that do 'network' junk.
Still, the interference problems I've listened to with IBOC both on AM and FM, seen / heard on the [still] active TV [analog] translators, even on Amateur Radio broadcasts that I have sent logs AND audio / video clips to the regional FCC only to be told that even being able to view / hear the noise they claim there are no "interference" problems in the area.
(Remember the 36 point AM radiation testing of years ago to make sure your lobes did not stray.)
That they are pushing for "WHITE SPACE" operations, pushing for more adjacent channel stations, [readily paid off by IBIQUITY --- MY "opinion" for] pushing IBOC even with the known noise problems, looking to do BPL even with the complaints of ARRL, etc., and you basically read it will bring more [regulatory] money in to the FCC --- translation GOV'T --- pockets, plus as Mr. Ford noted above on how the FCC is now running free, the airwaves are no longer 'public' airwaves.
LPFM and small AM stations would be great ... as long as they are controlled so they do not interfere with larger stations nor themselves.
(You would think in this era of electronics, SOMEONE could build filters that would keep the interference out of next channel stations, eh?) (Errrr.....don't they already??????? wow it COULD work.)
Post your comment