LPFM clears Committee


The Senate Commerce Committee yesterday considered S.1675 Local Community Radio Act of 2007 in a mark-up session. We use the term "considered" loosely, since on an agenda that also included action on four other bills, a resolution and a number of nominations, the amount of extra time devoted to this bill was: zippy. A major thrust of the bill is to eliminate third-adjacency protections for full-power FM stations. This effort has been percolating for years and was considered in this Committee at least three years ago. The basis for allowing the loosened interference protection is a report from Mitre that has been criticized by the NAB as flawed and incomplete, but which has nonetheless been embraced by both Congress and the FCC. The entire slate of business passed, so presumably the next stop for S.1675 is the Senate floor.

RBR/TVBR observation: Just as allowing unlicensed devices into TV white spaces is a questionable move during the high-stakes conversion to digital broadcast, playing around with minimum separations in the FM band while HD radio is trying to develop legs may also be a questionable idea. There is also the possibility that a flood of new LPFM grants will make it that much more difficult for signal-challenged AM stations to fill coverage holes with FM translators. If you have concerns about this bill on any count, the time to bring them to the attention of your Senators is now.

The text of the bill
Local Community Radio Act of 2007 (Introduced in Senate) S. 1675
To implement the recommendations of the Federal Communications Commission report to the Congress regarding low-power FM service. IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES June 21, 2007
Ms. CANTWELL (for herself and Mr. MCCAIN) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation

To implement the recommendations of the Federal Communications Commission report to the Congress regarding low-power FM service. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the `Local Community Radio Act of 2007′.

Congress makes the following findings:
(1) The passage of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 led to increased ownership consolidation in the radio industry.
(2) At a hearing before the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation, on June 4, 2003, all 5 members of the Federal Communications Commission testified that there has been, in at least some local radio markets, too much consolidation.
(3) A commitment to localism–local operations, local research, local     management, locally-originated programming, local artists, and local news     and events–would bolster radio listening.
(4) Local communities have sought to launch radio stations to meet their local needs. However, due to the scarce amount of spectrum available and the high cost of buying and running a large station, many local communities are unable to establish a radio station.
(5) In 2003, the average cost to acquire a commercial radio station was more than 2,500,000.
(6) In January, 2000, the Federal Communications Commission authorized a new, affordable community radio service called `low-power FM’ or `LPFM’ to `enhance locally focused community-oriented radio broadcasting’.
(7) Through the creation of LPFM, the Commission sought to `create opportunities for new voices on the air waves and to allow local groups, including schools, churches, and other community-based organizations, to provide programming responsive to local community needs and interests’.
(8) The Commission made clear that the creation of LPFM would not compromise the integrity of the FM radio band by stating, `We are committed to creating a low-power FM radio service only if it does not cause unacceptable interference to existing radio service.’.
(9) Currently, FM translator stations can operate on the second- and third-adjacent channels to full power radio stations, up to an effective radiated power of 250 watts, pursuant to part 74 of title 47, Code of Federal Regulations, using the very same transmitters that LPFM stations will use. The Commission based its LPFM rules on the actual performance of these translators that already operate without undue interference to FM stations. The actual interference record of these translators is far more useful than any results that further testing could yield.
(10) Small rural broadcasters were particularly concerned about a lengthy and costly interference complaint process. Therefore, in September, 2000, the Commission created a simple process to address interference complaints regarding LPFM stations on an expedited basis.
(11) In December, 2000, Congress delayed the full implementation of LPFM until an independent engineering study was completed and reviewed. This delay was due to some broadcasters’ concerns that LPFM service would cause interference in the FM band.
(12) The delay prevented millions of Americans from having a locally operated, community based radio station in their neighborhood.
(13) Over 500 LPFM stations were allowed to proceed despite the congressional action. These stations are currently on the air and are run by local government agencies, groups promoting arts and education to immigrant and indigenous peoples, artists, schools, religious organizations, environmental groups, organizations promoting literacy, and many other civically-oriented organizations.
(14) After 2 years and the expenditure of 2,193,343 in taxpayer dollars to conduct this study, the broadcasters’ concerns were demonstrated to be unsubstantiated.
(15) Minorities represent almost a third of our population. However, according to the Federal Communication Commission’s most recent Form 323 data on the race and gender of full power, commercial broadcast licensees, minorities own only 7 percent of all local television and radio stations. Women represent more than half of the population, but own only 6 percent of all local television and radio stations. LPFM stations, while not a solution to the overall inequalities in minority and female broadcast ownership, provide an additional opportunity for underrepresented communities to operate a station and provide local communities with a greater diversity of viewpoints and culture.
(16) LPFM stations have proven to be a vital source of information during local or national emergencies. Out of the few stations that were able to stay online during Katrina, several were LPFM stations. In Bay St. Louis, Mississippi, LPFM station WQRZ remained on the air during Hurricane Katrina and served as the Emergency Operations Center for Hancock County. Additionally, after Hurricane Katrina when thousands of evacuees temporarily housed at the Houston Astrodome were unable to hear information about the availability of food and ice, the location of FEMA representatives, and the whereabouts of missing loved ones over the loud speakers, volunteers handed out thousands of transistor radios and established a LPFM station outside the Astrodome to broadcast such information.

Section 632 of the Departments of Commerce, Justice, and State, the Judiciary, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2001 (Public Law 106-553; 114 Stat. 2762A-111), is repealed.

The Federal Communications Commission shall modify its rules to eliminate  third-adjacent minimum distance separation requirements between–
(1) low-power FM stations; and
(2) full-service FM stations, FM translator stations, and FM booster stations.

The Federal Communications Commission shall retain its rules that provide  third-adjacent channel protection for full-power non-commercial FM stations  that broadcast radio reading services via a subcarrier frequency from  potential low-power FM station interference.

The Federal Communications Commission when licensing FM translator stations  shall ensure–
(1) that licenses are available to both FM translator stations and low-power FM stations; and
(2) that such decisions are made based on the needs of the local community.