Citizens for the Preservation of Rural Living (CPRL) has sued San Bernardino County and Lazer Broadcasting’s Regional Mexican KXRS-FM Hemet, CA over a 43-ft. antenna the Board of Supervisors approved 11/27/12. The antenna site overlooks Wildwood State Park in Yucaipa.
In a write of mandate filed in San Bernardino Superior Court, CPRL, which encompasses the city of Yucaipa, the Oak Glen Wildlands Conservancy and more than 17,000 Yucaipa and local residents, alleges the county failed to comply with state environmental laws when the BOS approved the antenna.
For five years, the group has been battling Oxnard-based Lazer Broadcasting over the antenna, which opponents say obstructs the pristine landscape and views at the park. The group alleges in its suit that the project warrants an environmental impact report, not a mitigated negative declaration, reports The San Bernardino Sun.
The difference between an environmental impact report (EIR) and a mitigated negative declaration (MND) is that an EIR is required if a project is determined to have a significant impact on the environment, whereas an MND, which was used in the radio tower project, is used if it is believed a project’s environmental impacts can be reduced to an insignificant level, the story said.
“CPRL has always taken the position that a full environmental impact report should have been prepared prior to consideration of the Lazer application to construct the tower,” said John Mirau, a Redlands attorney and spokesman for the group. “The county of San Bernardino ignored our request for an EIR, so we now will have the court determine if the county violated the California Environmental Quality Act by approving the tower without preparing an EIR.”
Lazer owns the 38 acres of land near the intersection of Oak Glen and Wildwood Canyon roads, west of Pisgah Peak Road, where it plans to erect its antenna. The company initially proposed a 140-foot tall lattice tower with a 250-square-foot equipment building and 500-gallon propane tank to run a backup generator, which the Board of Supervisors rejected.
Lazer scaled the project down to its current configuration – an antenna affixed to a 43-foot-tall wooden monopole – which was palatable to the county but not to project opponents, who still argue the project will be an eyesore and negatively impact the area’s natural landscape.
“The transmission tower and associated industrial uses threaten the pristine wilderness experience and scenic vistas that inspired community members to create Wildwood State Park in 2003,” according to the lawsuit.
The court document also states that the project’s construction and fencing would disturb the habitat of threatened and endangered species including the western fence and coastal horn lizards, as well large mammals including deer and bear.
The citizens group is not opposed to Lazer constructing a radio tower on property that is not environmentally sensitive, Mirau told the paper. He said in an e-mail to that the group even offered to buy the Lazer property and help them find a suitable location to construct the tower.
But officials representing Lazer Broadcasting say the Pisgah Peak location, already approved by the FCC, is the only location that will allow the broadcaster to expand its listener base from roughly 191,000 to more than 2 million and allow it to transmit out of Hemet, in Riverside County.
County spokesman David Wert said in an e-mail Friday that although the county is named as a defendant in the lawsuit, it doesn’t have anything at stake.
“There’s no worst case scenario for the county. The county doesn’t benefit if the project happens and the county doesn’t suffer if it doesn’t happen,” Wert said. “The county doesn’t incur any kind of penalty if a judge agrees with the plaintiff.”
He said Lazer Broadcasting bears all costs in the case, even the county’s.
“Having said that, the county conducted a complete and open process in full compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act,” Wert said. “The project was considered publicly twice by the Planning Commission and twice by the Board of Supervisors, which rejected it until major revisions were made.”
RBR-TVBR observation: Lazer bought the property legally, got FCC approval legally and got BOS approval legally. They’ve been fighting locals for this project for five years. The antenna is going to be placed on a short wood pole. How on earth could this threaten endangered species or be “environmentally sensitive”? Looks like the EIR is just a technicality at this point because the site’s current configuration wouldn’t need one…but yes, enough that Lazer will incur yet more legal fees to fight this.